A Lower-Bound Result on the Power of a Genetic Algorithm

This paper presents a lower-bound result on the computational power of a genetic algorithm in the context of combinatorial optimization. We describe a new genetic algorithm, the merged genetic algorithm, and prove that for the class of monotonic functions, the algorithm finds the optimal solution, and does so with an exponential convergence rate. The analysis pertains to the ideal behavior of the algorithm where the main task reduces to showing convergence of probability distributions over the search space of combinatorial structures to the optimal one. We take exponential convergence to be indicative of efficient solvability for the sample-bounded algorithm, although a sampling theory is needed to better relate the limit behavior to actual behavior. The paper concludes with a discussion of some immediate problems that lie ahead.

Universal Quantum Circuits

We define and construct efficient depth universal and almost size universal quantum circuits. Such circuits can be viewed as general purpose simulators for central classes of quantum circuits and can be used to capture the computational power of the circuit class being simulated. For depth we construct universal circuits whose depth is the same order as the circuits being simulated. For size, there is a log factor blow-up in the universal circuits constructed here. We prove that this construction is nearly optimal. Our results apply to a number of well-studied quantum circuit classes.

Computational Properties of SNAFU

Sensor applications in Sensoria [1] are expressed using STEP (Sensorium Task Execution Plan). SNAFU (Sensor-Net Applications as Functional Units) serves as a high-level sensor-programming language, which is compiled into STEP. In SNAFU’s current form, its differences with STEP are relatively minor, as they are limited to shorthands and macros not available in STEP. We show that, however restrictive it may seem, SNAFU has in fact universal power; technically, it is a Turing-complete language, i.e., any Turing program can be written in SNAFU (though not always conveniently). Although STEP may be allowed to have universal power, as a low-level language not directly available to Sensorium users, SNAFU programmers may use this power for malicious purposes or inadvertently introduce errors with destructive consequences. In future developments of SNAFU, we plan to introduce restrictions and highlevel features with safety guards, such as those provided by a type system, which will make SNAFU programming safer.