1 resultado para Quality Analysis and Evaluation
em Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (5)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (15)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (28)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (10)
- Aston University Research Archive (22)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (5)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (15)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (5)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (107)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (8)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (78)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (9)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (13)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (20)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (5)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (12)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (19)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (13)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (93)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (5)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (11)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (24)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (234)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (26)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (2)
- Scielo Uruguai (2)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (19)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- University of Michigan (25)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (9)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
In the first part of this paper we reviewed the fingerprint classification literature from two different perspectives: the feature extraction and the classifier learning. Aiming at answering the question of which among the reviewed methods would perform better in a real implementation we end up in a discussion which showed the difficulty in answering this question. No previous comparison exists in the literature and comparisons among papers are done with different experimental frameworks. Moreover, the difficulty in implementing published methods was stated due to the lack of details in their description, parameters and the fact that no source code is shared. For this reason, in this paper we will go through a deep experimental study following the proposed double perspective. In order to do so, we have carefully implemented some of the most relevant feature extraction methods according to the explanations found in the corresponding papers and we have tested their performance with different classifiers, including those specific proposals made by the authors. Our aim is to develop an objective experimental study in a common framework, which has not been done before and which can serve as a baseline for future works on the topic. This way, we will not only test their quality, but their reusability by other researchers and will be able to indicate which proposals could be considered for future developments. Furthermore, we will show that combining different feature extraction models in an ensemble can lead to a superior performance, significantly increasing the results obtained by individual models.