1 resultado para COOPERATIVE AGGREGATION
em Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (11)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Aquatic Commons (63)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (4)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (12)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (14)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (59)
- Boston University Digital Common (8)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (21)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (61)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (55)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (8)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (10)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (4)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (2)
- Digital Howard @ Howard University | Howard University Research (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (12)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (120)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (9)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (5)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (108)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (95)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (6)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (73)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (7)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (10)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
We study axiomatically situations in which the society agrees to treat voters with different characteristics distinctly. In this setting, we propose a set of intuitive axioms and show that they jointly characterize a new class of voting procedures, called Type-weighted Approval Voting. According to this family, each voter has a strictly positive and finite weight (the weight is necessarily the same for all voters with the same characteristics) and the alternative with the highest number of weighted votes is elected. The implemented voting procedure reduces to Approval Voting in case all voters are identical or the procedure assigns the same weight to all types. Using this idea, we also obtain a new characterization of Approval Voting.