1 resultado para factors relevant to exercise of discretion to transfer to QCAT
em Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (18)
- Aston University Research Archive (44)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (16)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (34)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (7)
- Bioline International (4)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (80)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (61)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (7)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (12)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (14)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (23)
- Digital Howard @ Howard University | Howard University Research (1)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (23)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (21)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (3)
- Earth Simulator Research Results Repository (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (3)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (6)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (22)
- Nottingham eTheses (3)
- Open Access Repository of Association for Learning Technology (ALT) (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (8)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (3)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (6)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (68)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (6)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (4)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (52)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (9)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade do Minho (4)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (47)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (5)
- University of Michigan (55)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (90)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
Resumo:
Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a process through which research is applied in daily clinical practice. Occupational therapists (OTs) and physiotherapists (PTs) are expected to work in line with EBP in order to optimise health care resources. This expectation is too seldom fulfilled. Consequently, research findings may not be implemented in clinical practice in a timely manner, or at all. To remedy this situation, additional knowledge is needed regarding what factors influence the process of EBP among practitioners. The purpose of the present study was to identify factors that influence the use of EBP and the experienced effects of the use of EBP among PTs and OTs in their clinical work. Method: This was a qualitative interview study that consisted of six group interviews involving either OTs or PTs employed by the Jönköping County Council in the South of Sweden. Resulting data were analysed using content analysis. Results: The analysis resulted in the following categories: “definition of evidence and EBP”, “sources of evidence”, “barriers to acquiring evidence and to using evidence in clinical work”, “factors that facilitate the acquisition of evidence and the use of evidence in clinical work”, and “personal experiences of using EBP”. Basing clinical practice on scientific evidence evoked positive experiences, although an ambivalent view towards acting on clinical experience was evident. Participants reported that time for and increased knowledge about searching for, evaluating, and implementing EBP were needed. Conclusion: Because OTs are more oriented towards professional theories and models, and PTs are more focused on randomised controlled trials of interventions, different strategies appear to be needed to increase EBP in these two professions. Management support was considered vital to the implementation of EBP. However, the personal obligation to work in line with EBP must also be emphasised; the participants apparently underestimate its importance.