1 resultado para Grade of satisfaction
em Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Aquatic Commons (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (11)
- Aston University Research Archive (14)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (21)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (32)
- Brock University, Canada (7)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (15)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (11)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (7)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (21)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (11)
- Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco - Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (11)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia - Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (7)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (7)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (9)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (27)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (75)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (16)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (14)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (26)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (11)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (221)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (10)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (18)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (10)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (17)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (62)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (24)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (4)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (6)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
Objectives: To investigate patients' mobility and satisfaction with their lower-limb prosthetic or orthotic device and related service delivery in Sierra Leone; to compare groups of patients regarding type and level of assistive device, gender, area of residence, income; and to identify factors associated with satisfaction with the assistive device and service. Methods: A total of 139 patients answered questionnaires, including the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire (QUEST 2.0). Results: Eighty-six percent of assistive devices were in use, but half needed repair. Thirty-three percent of patients reported pain when using their assistive device. Patients had difficulties or could not walk at all on: uneven ground (65%); hills (75%); and stairs (66%). Patients were quite satisfied with their assistive device and the service (mean 3.7 out of 5 in QUEST), but reported 886 problems. Approximately half of the patients could not access services. In relation to mobility and service delivery, women, orthotic patients and patients using above-knee assistive devices had the poorest results. The general condition of the assistive device and patients' ability to walk on uneven ground were associated with satisfaction with the assistive devices and service. Conclusion: Patients reported high levels of mobility while using their device although they experienced pain and difficulties walking on challenging surfaces. Limitations in the effectiveness of assistive devices and limited access to follow-up services and repairs were issues desired to be addressed.