1 resultado para history of assessment
em Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (7)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (58)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (24)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (12)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (114)
- Boston University Digital Common (20)
- Brock University, Canada (9)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (5)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (74)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (5)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (27)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (155)
- Digital Archives@Colby (6)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (5)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (17)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (7)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (11)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (30)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (138)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (78)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (42)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (7)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (24)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (8)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The Short Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability is a structured judgement tool used to inform risk estimation for multiple adverse outcomes. In research, risk estimates outperform the tool's strength and vulnerability scales for violence prediction. Little is known about what its’component parts contribute to the assignment of risk estimates and how those estimates fare in prediction of non-violent adverse outcomes compared with the structured components. START assessment and outcomes data from a secure mental health service (N=84) was collected. Binomial and multinomial regression analyses determined the contribution of selected elements of the START structured domain and recent adverse risk events to risk estimates and outcomes prediction for violence, self-harm/suicidality, victimisation, and self-neglect. START vulnerabilities and lifetime history of violence, predicted the violence risk estimate; self-harm and victimisation estimates were predicted only by corresponding recent adverse events. Recent adverse events uniquely predicted all corresponding outcomes, with the exception of self-neglect which was predicted by the strength scale. Only for victimisation did the risk estimate outperform prediction based on the START components and recent adverse events. In the absence of recent corresponding risk behaviour, restrictions imposed on the basis of START-informed risk estimates could be unwarranted and may be unethical.