Respuesta al ECG de septiembre de 2015

SIN FINANCIACIÓN

Outpatient follow-up during the first year after heart transplantation, is it feasible?

First year follow-up after heart transplantation requires invasive tests. Although patients used to be hospitalized for this purpose, ambulatory invasive procedures now offer the possibility of outpatient follow-up. The feasibility and security of this strategy is unknown. From 2007 we transitioned to outpatient follow-up. We have retrospectively reviewed the clinical course of the outpatient group (2007 to 2014) and an inpatient group (2000–2006). Basal characteristics, hospital stay, infections, rejection episodes and vascular complications were evaluated. 87 patients had Inpatient Follow-up (IF) and 98 Outpatient Follow-up (OF). Basal characteristics were similar, with significant differences in immunosuppression (tacrolimus IF 44.8% vs. OF 90.8%, and mycophenolate IF 86.2% vs OF 100%, both p values < 0.001) and age (IF 52 ± 11.5 years vs. OF 56.1 ± 11 years, p = 0.016). In the OF group more clinical visits were performed (IF 10 vs. OF 13, p < 0.001) while hospital stay was lower (IF 23 days vs. OF 3 days, p < 0.001). The rate of infection, rejection, and vascular complications was similar. No difference was found in 1-year mortality (IF 2.3% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.60). First year post-cardiac transplantation outpatient follow-up seems to be feasible and safe in terms of infection, rejection, vascular complications and mortality.

Sex-related differences in centenarians and their hearts

Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Proyecto de Registro Clínico de la Sección de Cardiología Clínica 2013

Force determinants of sit-to-stand transfer in patients with haemophilic arthropathy: Cross-sectional study

SIN FINANCIACIÓN

Relationship of joint deterioration with the generation of muscle strength in patients with hemophilic arthropathy. An observational study

SIN FINANCIACIÓN

Design of a myofascial therapy protocol for the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy of the knee and ankle

Hemophilic arthropathy limits daily life activities of patients with hemophilia, presenting with clinical manifestations such as chronic pain, limited mobility, or muscular atrophy. Although physical therapy is considered essential for these patients, few clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the various physiotherapy techniques. Physical therapy may be useful for treating hemophilic arthropathy by applying safe and effective techniques. However, it is necessary to create protocols for possible treatments to avoid the risk of bleeding in these patients. This article describes the musculoskeletal pathology of hemophilic arthropathy and characteristics of fascial therapy. This systematic protocol for treatment by fascial therapy of knee and ankle arthropathy in patients with hemophilia provides an analysis of the techniques that, depending on their purpose and methodology, can be used in these patients. Similarly, the protocol's applicability is analyzed and the steps to be followed in future research studies are described. Fascial therapy is a promising physiotherapy technique for treating fascial tissue and joint contractures in patients with hemophilic arthropathy. More research is needed to assess the efficacy and safety of this intervention in patients with hemophilia, particularly with randomized multicenter clinical trials

Assessment of quality of life in children with hemophilic arthropathy. An observational study

SIN FINANCIACIÓN

Perception of disease based on the level education and type of employment. Influence on adherence to treatment in young patients with hemophilia

SIN FINANCIACIÓN

Selección de temas de actualidad en cardiología clínica, cardiología geriátrica e insuficiencia cardiaca y trasplante 2015

SIN FINANCIACIÓN

Outpatient follow-up during the first year after heart transplantation, is it feasible?

First year follow-up after heart transplantation requires invasive tests. Although patients used to be hospitalized for this purpose, ambulatory invasive procedures now offer the possibility of outpatient follow-up. The feasibility and security of this strategy is unknown. From 2007 we transitioned to outpatient follow-up. We have retrospectively reviewed the clinical course of the outpatient group (2007 to 2014) and an inpatient group (2000–2006). Basal characteristics, hospital stay, infections, rejection episodes and vascular complications were evaluated. 87 patients had Inpatient Follow-up (IF) and 98 Outpatient Follow-up (OF). Basal characteristics were similar, with significant differences in immunosuppression (tacrolimus IF 44.8% vs. OF 90.8%, and mycophenolate IF 86.2% vs OF 100%, both p values < 0.001) and age (IF 52 ± 11.5 years vs. OF 56.1 ± 11 years, p = 0.016). In the OF group more clinical visits were performed (IF 10 vs. OF 13, p < 0.001) while hospital stay was lower (IF 23 days vs. OF 3 days, p < 0.001). The rate of infection, rejection, and vascular complications was similar. No difference was found in 1-year mortality (IF 2.3% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.60). First year post-cardiac transplantation outpatient follow-up seems to be feasible and safe in terms of infection, rejection, vascular complications and mortality.

Una causa reversible de fracaso ventricular derecho agudo tras el trasplante cardiaco

SIN FINANCIACIÓN

Predictors of in-hospital mortality among cardiogenic shock patients. Prognostic and therapeutic implications

Cardiogenic shock (CS) has a poor prognosis. The heterogeneity in the mortality through different subgroups suggests that some factors can be useful to perform risk stratification and guide management. We aimed to find predictors of in-hospital mortality in these patients. We analyzed all cases of cardiogenic shock due to medical conditions admitted in our intensive acute cardiovascular care unity from November 2010 till November 2015. Clinical, biochemical and hemodynamic variables were registered, as was the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile at 24 h of CS diagnosis. From a total of 281 patients, 28 died within the first 24 h and were not included in the analysis. A total of 253 patients survived the first 24 h, mean age was 68.8 ± 14.4 years, and 174 (68.8%) were men. Etiologies: acute coronary syndrome 146 (57.7%), acute heart failure 60 (23.7%), arrhythmias 35 (13.8%), and others 12 (4.8%). A total of 91 patients (36.0%) died during hospitalization. We found the following independent predictors of in-hospital mortality: age (odds ratio [OR] 1.032, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003–1.062), blood glucose (OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.001–1.008), heart rate (OR 1.014, 95% CI 1.001–1.028), and INTERMACS profile (OR 0.168, 95% CI 0.107–0.266). In patients with CS the INTERMACS profile at 24 h of diagnosis was associated with higher in-hospital mortality. This and other prognostic variables (age, blood glucose, and heart rate) may be useful for risk stratification and to select appropriate medical or invasive interventions.

Muscle strength in spanish children with mild and severe haemophilia A

SIN FINANCIACIÓN

Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion differences among children with mild and severehaemophilia

SIN FINANCIACIÓN

The Spanish validation of veritas-pro scale to assess adherence to treatment in patients with hemophilia

SIN FINANCIACIÓN