L'azione economica tra etica e neurobiologia

The heated debate over the conflict between ethics and economics is often described as an epochal issue, an expression of present-day fragility, resulting from the implosion of the development model, which has characterised western society. The debate, however, exposes a paradox. Whilst, on the one hand, the neoclassical economic theory is radically criticized, on the other such criticism does not appear to delineate any solid, practicable alternative. Thus, the mainstream economic theory is still taught, practised by individuals as well as institutions, and further developed by the prevailing academic research. For this reason, a viable alternative needs to be sought, along with a new research methodology, which would allow to apply novel and more coherent theoretical assumptions into effective research and real cases. The theoretical instruments by which to create the models for human behaviour need to take into account the biological foundation of behaviour, expressed in evolutionary genetics terms. The aim of this paper is to establish whether our moral knowledge of economics may claim any scientific objectivity in light of advances in subject areas that differ in their scope and methods: moral philosophy, economics, cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence, each of which makes a specific contribution to understanding the operation of the human mind and towards forming the moral values onto which economic choice and action are founded. Given that the object of the study of economic science is the analysis of complex systems, nowadays the most efficient method seems to be artificial life simulation.

La divisione ereditaria

Studying the division means trying to describe a complex phenomenon that accommodation dogmatic created many disagreements in doctrine and jurisprudence, and today, despite the debate on the subject has reached the landing at least reassuring, never fails to impress for a certain vitality. The main purpose of this work is to analyze, with no claim to completeness, the division in modern key, both from a structural point of view that from a functional point of view. Made a brief introduction on the history and evolution of legal profiles of the institute, it will switch you to the analysis of the essential elements that combine to describe the situation, to analyze its effects, and to place it, only if possible, within the categories of law developed by the doctrine and jurisprudence. The second aspect of investigation, however, will focus on the study of the case divisional functionally analyzing in detail what are the various ways in which it is possible to proceed to division, and what are the critical issues relating to each divisional scheme, with particular attention to the division of the estate, which has always been, to its inherent complexity, the paradigm to refer to, and the ground of comparison of various theories proposed, in light of recent legislative changes, albeit marginal, report the current attention to a phenomenon instrumental in the distribution of wealth, perhaps too much overlooked.