1 resultado para social science research methods
em Repository Napier
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (3)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (5)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (4)
- Archive of European Integration (7)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (24)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (24)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (53)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (4)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (10)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (6)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (84)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (11)
- Digital Peer Publishing (6)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (10)
- Duke University (4)
- Ecology and Society (3)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (9)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (10)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (6)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (10)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (77)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (147)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (2)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (6)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (2)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (43)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (4)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (7)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (104)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (21)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (43)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Introduction. Research design should take into account both (a) the specific nature of the object under scrutiny, and (b) approaches to its study in the past. This is to ensure that informed decisions are made regarding research design in future empirical studies. Here these factors are taken into account with reference to methodological choice for a doctoral study on tacit knowledge sharing, and the extent to tacit knowledge sharing may be facilitated by online tools. The larger study responds to calls for the two domains of knowledge management and human information behaviour to be considered together in terms of their research approaches and theory development. Method. Relevant literature – both domain-specific (knowledge management) and general (research methods in social science) - was identified and analysed to identify the most appropriate approaches for an empirical study of tacit knowledge sharing. Analysis. The analysis shows that there are a number of challenges associated with studying an intangible entity such as tacit knowledge. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods have been adopted in prior work on this theme, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. Results. The analysis has informed a decision to adopt a research approach that deploys mixed methods for an inductive case study to extend knowledge of the influence of online tools on tacit knowledge sharing. Conclusion. This work intends to open the debate on methodological choice and routes to implementation for studies that are subject to practical constraints imposed by the context in which they are situated.