1 resultado para selection methods
em Repository Napier
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (10)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (4)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (27)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (24)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brunel University (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (16)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (29)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (4)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (50)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (9)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (7)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (14)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (6)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (32)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (521)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (39)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (15)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (13)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (7)
- University of Washington (4)
Resumo:
There is still a lack of an engineering approach for building Web systems, and the field of measuring the Web is not yet mature. In particular, there is an uncertainty in the selection of evaluation methods, and there are risks of standardizing inadequate evaluation practices. It is important to know whether we are evaluating the Web or specific website(s). We need a new categorization system, a different focus on evaluation methods, and an in-depth analysis that reveals the strengths and weaknesses of each method. As a contribution to the field of Web evaluation, this study proposes a novel approach to view and select evaluation methods based on the purpose and platforms of the evaluation. It has been shown that the choice of the appropriate evaluation method(s) depends greatly on the purpose of the evaluation.