1 resultado para gifted and talented students
em Repository Napier
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Repository Napier (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (23)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (12)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (36)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (12)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- CUNY Academic Works (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (7)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (72)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (6)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (6)
- Duke University (3)
- Düsseldorfer Dokumenten- und Publikationsservice (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Escola Superior de Educação de Paula Frassinetti (2)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (4)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (4)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (20)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (58)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (198)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (22)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Scielo España (3)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (3)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (14)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (5)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Connecticut - USA (5)
- University of Michigan (58)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (17)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (3)
Resumo:
The setting, marking and providing feedback on assessments forms an important part of a tutor’s role. Studies into the use of feedback and how it is interpreted by students indicate a mismatch between what students are looking for and what tutors think they are giving. Tutors comment that students are more interested in the mark than the feedback, and yet students indicate that they do not get enough feedback, or that it is not useful. This study investigates student and staff perceptions of the linking of marking and feedback in face-to-face sessions. A cohort of year one university students were given the option of receiving either written feedback or a 15 minute meeting with one of their tutors to have their essay marked with them. Forty nine students chose face-to-face marking, the remaining 35 students received written feedback. Focus groups were used to investigate the student experience. Staff members were also asked to reflect on the process. Students and staff found the experience of face-to-face marking beneficial and positive. Both felt that the time spent together allowed for a feedback dialogue about the piece of work, and that staff could explain and justify why marks were given.