1 resultado para face to face
em Repository Napier
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (9)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (26)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (17)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (9)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (26)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (9)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (51)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (25)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (13)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (8)
- Escola Superior de Educação de Paula Frassinetti (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (24)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (3)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (16)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (12)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (35)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (215)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (5)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (14)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (9)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (11)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (55)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (5)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (10)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (10)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (10)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (50)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (14)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (7)
- University of Washington (1)
- USA Library of Congress (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
The setting, marking and providing feedback on assessments forms an important part of a tutor’s role. Studies into the use of feedback and how it is interpreted by students indicate a mismatch between what students are looking for and what tutors think they are giving. Tutors comment that students are more interested in the mark than the feedback, and yet students indicate that they do not get enough feedback, or that it is not useful. This study investigates student and staff perceptions of the linking of marking and feedback in face-to-face sessions. A cohort of year one university students were given the option of receiving either written feedback or a 15 minute meeting with one of their tutors to have their essay marked with them. Forty nine students chose face-to-face marking, the remaining 35 students received written feedback. Focus groups were used to investigate the student experience. Staff members were also asked to reflect on the process. Students and staff found the experience of face-to-face marking beneficial and positive. Both felt that the time spent together allowed for a feedback dialogue about the piece of work, and that staff could explain and justify why marks were given.