1 resultado para company rules
em Repository Napier
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- University of Cagliari UniCA Eprints (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (6)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (3)
- Aquatic Commons (9)
- Archive of European Integration (57)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (15)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (4)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (170)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (27)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (92)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (8)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (10)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (3)
- CUNY Academic Works (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (5)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (21)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (13)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (6)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (66)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (150)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (31)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (11)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (7)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (19)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (6)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (22)
- University of Michigan (37)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (1)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (6)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (6)
Resumo:
The rules which epitomise good writing may on occasions be broken, deliberately and with what the writers judge to be good purpose. This can well occur when students or staff set out to engage effectively with their personal and professional development, through personal reflection on and in experiences. They may do this in what has been called “stream of consciousness” writing, which is deliberately compiled in a manner at variance with the general rules for best practice. The rationale for such an unusual decision, namely to engage in what is frankly disorderly writing, is set out briefly in this chapter. Its characteristics are summarised, in implicit contrast with more conventional styles of writing. Examples are included of claims for the effectiveness of this style when used for developmental purposes by students and staff; and reference is made to the publications of some of those who have endorsed this approach.