1 resultado para claims
em Repository Napier
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (8)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (8)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archive of European Integration (6)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (13)
- Aston University Research Archive (8)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (9)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (44)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (8)
- Boston University Digital Common (7)
- Brock University, Canada (41)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (12)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (5)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (10)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (10)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (9)
- Harvard University (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (51)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (14)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (117)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (319)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (2)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (39)
- University of Michigan (111)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (6)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (10)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The rules which epitomise good writing may on occasions be broken, deliberately and with what the writers judge to be good purpose. This can well occur when students or staff set out to engage effectively with their personal and professional development, through personal reflection on and in experiences. They may do this in what has been called “stream of consciousness” writing, which is deliberately compiled in a manner at variance with the general rules for best practice. The rationale for such an unusual decision, namely to engage in what is frankly disorderly writing, is set out briefly in this chapter. Its characteristics are summarised, in implicit contrast with more conventional styles of writing. Examples are included of claims for the effectiveness of this style when used for developmental purposes by students and staff; and reference is made to the publications of some of those who have endorsed this approach.