1 resultado para Methodological pluralism
em Repository Napier
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (13)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Archive of European Integration (16)
- Aston University Research Archive (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (67)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (79)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (41)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (5)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (28)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (20)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (6)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Escola Superior de Educação de Paula Frassinetti (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (48)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (6)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (74)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (9)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (87)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (49)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (7)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (23)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (58)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (48)
- Scielo Uruguai (1)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (10)
- Universidade do Minho (30)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (11)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (33)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (6)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (11)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (55)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Introduction. Research design should take into account both (a) the specific nature of the object under scrutiny, and (b) approaches to its study in the past. This is to ensure that informed decisions are made regarding research design in future empirical studies. Here these factors are taken into account with reference to methodological choice for a doctoral study on tacit knowledge sharing, and the extent to tacit knowledge sharing may be facilitated by online tools. The larger study responds to calls for the two domains of knowledge management and human information behaviour to be considered together in terms of their research approaches and theory development. Method. Relevant literature – both domain-specific (knowledge management) and general (research methods in social science) - was identified and analysed to identify the most appropriate approaches for an empirical study of tacit knowledge sharing. Analysis. The analysis shows that there are a number of challenges associated with studying an intangible entity such as tacit knowledge. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods have been adopted in prior work on this theme, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. Results. The analysis has informed a decision to adopt a research approach that deploys mixed methods for an inductive case study to extend knowledge of the influence of online tools on tacit knowledge sharing. Conclusion. This work intends to open the debate on methodological choice and routes to implementation for studies that are subject to practical constraints imposed by the context in which they are situated.