1 resultado para Building methods
em Repository Napier
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (94)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (5)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (20)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (2)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (16)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (3)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (49)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (14)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (4)
- Georgian Library Association, Georgia (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (18)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (73)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (10)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (18)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (3)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (45)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (13)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (6)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (4)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (73)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (104)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (15)
- Universidade do Minho (51)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (4)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (90)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (14)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (145)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
There is still a lack of an engineering approach for building Web systems, and the field of measuring the Web is not yet mature. In particular, there is an uncertainty in the selection of evaluation methods, and there are risks of standardizing inadequate evaluation practices. It is important to know whether we are evaluating the Web or specific website(s). We need a new categorization system, a different focus on evaluation methods, and an in-depth analysis that reveals the strengths and weaknesses of each method. As a contribution to the field of Web evaluation, this study proposes a novel approach to view and select evaluation methods based on the purpose and platforms of the evaluation. It has been shown that the choice of the appropriate evaluation method(s) depends greatly on the purpose of the evaluation.