Stigma toward schizophrenia: do all psychiatrists behave the same? Latent profile analysis of a national sample of psychiatrists in Brazil

Background: An important issue concerning the worldwide fight against stigma is the evaluation of psychiatrists’ beliefs and attitudes toward schizophrenia and mental illness in general. However, there is as yet no consensus on this matter in the literature, and results vary according to the stigma dimension assessed and to the cultural background of the sample. The aim of this investigation was to search for profiles of stigmatizing beliefs related to schizophrenia in a national sample of psychiatrists in Brazil. Methods: A sample of 1414 psychiatrists were recruited from among those attending the 2009 Brazilian Congress of Psychiatry. A questionnaire was applied in face-to-face interviews. The questionnaire addressed four stigma dimensions, all in reference to individuals with schizophrenia: stereotypes, restrictions, perceived prejudice and social distance. Stigma item scores were included in latent profile analyses; the resulting profiles were entered into multinomial logistic regression models with sociodemographics, in order to identify significant correlates. Results: Three profiles were identified. The “no stigma” subjects (n = 337) characterized individuals with schizophrenia in a positive light, disagreed with restrictions, and displayed a low level of social distance. The “unobtrusive stigma” subjects (n = 471) were significantly younger and displayed the lowest level of social distance, although most of them agreed with involuntary admission and demonstrated a high level of perceived prejudice. The “great stigma” subjects (n = 606) negatively stereotyped individuals with schizophrenia, agreed with restrictions and scored the highest on the perceived prejudice and social distance dimensions. In comparison with the first two profiles, this last profile comprised a significantly larger number of individuals who were in frequent contact with a family member suffering from a psychiatric disorder, as well as comprising more individuals who had no such family member. Conclusions: Our study not only provides additional data related to an under-researched area but also reveals that psychiatrists are a heterogeneous group regarding stigma toward schizophrenia. The presence of different stigma profiles should be evaluated in further studies; this could enable anti-stigma initiatives to be specifically designed to effectively target the stigmatizing group.

Panorama atual dos repositórios institucionais das instituições de ensino superior no Brasil

O cenário atual de repositórios digitais mundialmente distribuídos estimula estudos diversificados com os quais esse trabalho visa contribuir, objetivando um levantamento dos repositórios de instituições de ensino superior no Brasil, verificando a eficácia de uma ferramenta experimental no tratamento e análise dos dados e usando como fontes os diretórios Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR), Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR), Diretório Luso-Brasileiro de Periódicos e Repositórios de Acesso Livre e a lista L_repositories. A ferramenta experimental Google Fusion Tables foi aplicada nos dados dos repositórios institucionais pesquisados, categorizando suas principais características: Instituição mantenedora, Natureza da instituição, Local, Região geográfica, Software adotado e sua versão, adoção do padrão Dublin Core e quantidade de trabalhos disponibilizados na data do estudo. Foram identificados 49 repositórios que em agosto de 2013 disponibilizavam 396.881 itens, sendo as instituições federais as com maior povoamento e o repositório LUME o primeiro em volume de itens; a região Sudeste com o maior número de repositórios e volume de itens disponibilizados; o DSpace o software predominante, com maior utilização da versão 1.6.2 e o padrão de metadados Dublin Core em todas as aplicações desse software. Este estudo comprovou a eficácia e utilidade do FusionTables, permitindo caracterizar o panorama atual de repositórios de instituições de ensino superior no Brasil. Os resultados foram disponibilizados em um Catálogo de Repositórios de Instituições de Ensino Superior no Brasil e um Mapa interativo dos Repositórios de Instituições de Ensino Superior no Brasil.

Comparative study by computed radiography, histology, and scanning electron microscopy of the articular cartilage of normal goats and in chronic infection with caprine arthritis-encephalitis virus

In the northeast of Brazil, caprine arthritis-encephalitis (CAE) is one of the key reasons for herd productivity decreasing that result in considerable economic losses. A comparative study was carried out using computed radiography (CR), histological analysis (HA), and scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) of the joints of CAE infected and normal goats. Humerus head surface of positive animals presented reduced joint space, increased bone density, and signs of degenerative joint disease (DJD). The carpal joint presented no morphological alterations in CR in any of the animals studied. Tarsus joint was the most affected, characterized by severe DJD, absence of joint space, increased periarticular soft tissue density, edema, and bone sclerosis. Histological analysis showed chronic tissue lesions, complete loss of the surface zone, absence of proteoglycans in the transition and radial zones and destruction of the cartilage surface in the CAE positive animals. Analysis by SEM showed ulcerated lesions with irregular and folded patterns on the joint surface that distinguished the limits between areas of normal and affected cartilage. The morphological study of the joints of normal and CAE positive goats deepened understanding of the alteration in the tissue bioarchitecture of the most affected joints. The SEM finding sustained previous histological reports, similar to those found for rheumatoid arthritis, suggesting that the goat infected with CAE can be considered as a potential model for research in this area.