1 resultado para Upkeep of assets
em Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (8)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (10)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (13)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (22)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (36)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (4)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (25)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (13)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (69)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (4)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (4)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (22)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (10)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (22)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (6)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Harvard University (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (8)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Open University Netherlands (5)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (25)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (232)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (3)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (61)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (6)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (14)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (11)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (12)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (3)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (17)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (5)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (5)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (12)
- University of Connecticut - USA (7)
- University of Michigan (19)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (9)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (8)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were significant differences in accounting indicators when comparing sustainable enterprises to other similar companies that are not considered as sustainable. The Corporate Sustainability Index of BM (São Paulo Stock, Commodities and Futures Exchange) was the criterion selected to break down the samples into sustainable and non-sustainable enterprises. The accounting indicators were separated into two kinds: risk (dividend payout, percentage growth of assets, financial leverage, current liquidity, asset size, variability of earnings, and accounting beta) and return (ROA, ROE, asset turnover, and net margin). We individually analyzed the companies in the energy sector, followed by those in the banking sector, as well as the entire ISE portfolio as of 2008/2009, including all the sectors. Mann-Whitney tests were performed in order to verify the difference of the means between the groups (ISE and non-ISE). The results, considering the method chosen and the time span covered by the study, indicate that there are no differences between sustainable companies and the others, when they are assessed by the accounting indicators used here.