DIGITAL LIBRARIES AND LEARNING OBJECTS REPOSITORIES

Discusses the technological changes that affects learning organizations as well as the human, technical, legal and sustainable aspects regarding learning objects repositories creation, maintenance and use. It presents concepts of information objects and learning objects, the functional requirements needed to their storage at Learning Management Systems. The role of Metadata is reviewed concerning learning objects creation and retrieval, followed by considerations about learning object repositories models, community participation/collaborative strategies and potential derived metrics/indicators. As a result of this desktop research, it can be said that not only technical competencies are critical to any learning objects repository implementation, but it urges that an engaged community of interest be establish as a key to support a learning object repository project. On that matter, researchers are applying Activity Theory (Vygostky, Luria y Leontiev) in order to seek joint perceptions and actions involving learning objects repository users, curators and managers, perceived as critical assets to a successful proposal.

Using complex networks concepts to assess approaches for citations in scientific papers

The number of citations received by authors in scientific journals has become a major parameter to assess individual researchers and the journals themselves through the impact factor. A fair assessment therefore requires that the criteria for selecting references in a given manuscript should be unbiased with regard to the authors or journals cited. In this paper, we assess approaches for citations considering two recommendations for authors to follow while preparing a manuscript: (i) consider similarity of contents with the topics investigated, lest related work should be reproduced or ignored; (ii) perform a systematic search over the network of citations including seminal or very related papers. We use formalisms of complex networks for two datasets of papers from the arXiv and the Web of Science repositories to show that neither of these two criteria is fulfilled in practice. By representing the texts as complex networks we estimated a similarity index between pieces of texts and found that the list of references did not contain the most similar papers in the dataset. This was quantified by calculating a consistency index, whose maximum value is one if the references in a given paper are the most similar in the dataset. For the areas of "complex networks" and "graphenes", the consistency index was only 0.11-0.23 and 0.10-0.25, respectively. To simulate a systematic search in the citation network, we employed a traditional random walk search (i.e. diffusion) and a random walk whose probabilities of transition are proportional to the number of the ingoing edges of the neighbours. The frequency of visits to the nodes (papers) in the network had a very small correlation with either the actual list of references in the papers or with the number of downloads from the arXiv repository. Therefore, apparently the authors and users of the repository did not follow the criterion related to a systematic search over the network of citations. Based on these results, we propose an approach that we believe is fairer for evaluating and complementing citations of a given author, effectively leading to a virtual scientometry.

Panorama atual dos repositórios institucionais das instituições de ensino superior no Brasil

O cenário atual de repositórios digitais mundialmente distribuídos estimula estudos diversificados com os quais esse trabalho visa contribuir, objetivando um levantamento dos repositórios de instituições de ensino superior no Brasil, verificando a eficácia de uma ferramenta experimental no tratamento e análise dos dados e usando como fontes os diretórios Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR), Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR), Diretório Luso-Brasileiro de Periódicos e Repositórios de Acesso Livre e a lista L_repositories. A ferramenta experimental Google Fusion Tables foi aplicada nos dados dos repositórios institucionais pesquisados, categorizando suas principais características: Instituição mantenedora, Natureza da instituição, Local, Região geográfica, Software adotado e sua versão, adoção do padrão Dublin Core e quantidade de trabalhos disponibilizados na data do estudo. Foram identificados 49 repositórios que em agosto de 2013 disponibilizavam 396.881 itens, sendo as instituições federais as com maior povoamento e o repositório LUME o primeiro em volume de itens; a região Sudeste com o maior número de repositórios e volume de itens disponibilizados; o DSpace o software predominante, com maior utilização da versão 1.6.2 e o padrão de metadados Dublin Core em todas as aplicações desse software. Este estudo comprovou a eficácia e utilidade do FusionTables, permitindo caracterizar o panorama atual de repositórios de instituições de ensino superior no Brasil. Os resultados foram disponibilizados em um Catálogo de Repositórios de Instituições de Ensino Superior no Brasil e um Mapa interativo dos Repositórios de Instituições de Ensino Superior no Brasil.

University of São Paulo, Brazil: open access movement

USP scientific production. USP journals. USP Open Access Movement.

BDPI Digital Library of USP in intellectual production

USP INFORMATION MANDATE – Resolution 6444 – Oct. 22th, 2012 Make public and accessible the knowledge generated by research developed at USP, encouraging the sharing, the use and generation of new content; •Preserve institutional memory by storing the full text of Intellectual Production (scientific, academic, artistic and technical); •Increase the impact of the knowledge generated in the university within the scientific community and the general public; •It is suggested to all members of the USP community to publish the results of their research, preferably, in open-access publication outlets and/or repositories and to include the permission to deposit their production in the BDPI system in their publication agreements. •Institutional Repository for Intellectual Production; •Official Source USP Statistical Yearbook.