Os fatores de riscos alimentares para câncer colorretal relacionado ao consumo de carnes

Uma das estratégias metodológicas para realizar a prática baseada em evidências é a revisão integrativa, que neste estudo teve como objetivo buscar e sintetizar as evidências disponíveis na literatura científica sobre os fatores de riscos alimentares para o câncer colorretal relacionado ao consumo de carnes. As bases de dados LILACS, MEDLINE, CINAHL e COCHRANE Library foram consultadas e os estudos pertinentes ao consumo de carnes somaram seis. As metanálises demonstraram que a ingestão de carne vermelha está relacionada com o aumento do risco para câncer colorretal em 28% a 35%, enquanto a carne processada está associada ao risco elevado de 20% a 49%. As evidências apontam a carne vermelha, a carne processada e o total de carne consumida como fatores de risco para o desenvolvimento de pólipos e câncer colorretal. Não foi identificado estudo que indicasse a ingestão de frango e peixe como fatores de risco.

Narrowing the gap of personalized medicine in emerging countries: the case of multiple endocrine neoplasias in Brazil

The finished version of the human genome sequence was completed in 2003, and this event initiated a revolution in medical practice, which is usually referred to as the age of genomic or personalized medicine. Genomic medicine aims to be predictive, personalized, preventive, and also participative (4Ps). It offers a new approach to several pathological conditions, although its impact so far has been more evident in mendelian diseases. This article briefly reviews the potential advantages of this approach, and also some issues that may arise in the attempt to apply the accumulated knowledge from genomic medicine to clinical practice in emerging countries. The advantages of applying genomic medicine into clinical practice are obvious, enabling prediction, prevention, and early diagnosis and treatment of several genetic disorders. However, there are also some issues, such as those related to: (a) the need for approval of a law equivalent to the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, which was approved in 2008 in the USA; (b) the need for private and public funding for genetics and genomics; (c) the need for development of innovative healthcare systems that may substantially cut costs (e.g. costs of periodic medical followup); (d) the need for new graduate and postgraduate curricula in which genomic medicine is emphasized; and (e) the need to adequately inform the population and possible consumers of genetic testing, with reference to the basic aspects of genomic medicine.