Neurogenic neuroprotection: Future perspectives

Neurogenic neuroprotection elicited by deep brain stimulation is emerging as a promising approach for treating patients with ischemic brain lesions. In rats, stimulation of the fastigial nucleus, but not dentate nucleus, has been shown to reduce the volume of focal infarction. Protection of neural tissue is a rapid intervention that has a relatively long-lasting effect, rendering fastigial nucleus stimulation (FNS) a potentially valuable method for clinical application. We review some of the main findings of animal experimental research from a clinical perspective. Results: Although the complete mechanisms of neuroprotection induced by FNS remain unclear, important data has been presented in the last two decades. The acute effect of electrical stimulation of the fastigial nucleus is likely mediated by a prolonged opening of potassium channels, and the sustained effect appears to be linked to inhibition of the apoptotic cascade. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying neurogenic neuroprotection by stimulation of deep brain nuclei, with special attention to the fastigial nucleus, can contribute toward improving neurological outcomes in ischemic brain insults.

Cognitive, Mood, and Electroencephalographic Effects of Noninvasive Cortical Stimulation With Weak Electrical Currents

Objectives: The use of noninvasive cortical electrical stimulation with weak currents has significantly increased in basic and clinical human studies. Initial, preliminary studies with this technique have shown encouraging results; however, the safety and tolerability of this method of brain stimulation have not been sufficiently explored yet. The purpose of our study was to assess the effects of direct current (DC) and alternating current (AC) stimulation at different intensities in order to measure their effects on cognition, mood, and electroencephalogram. Methods: Eighty-two healthy, right-handed subjects received active and sham stimulation in a randomized order. We conducted 164 ninety-minute sessions of electrical stimulation in 4 different protocols to assess safety of (1) anodal DC of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC); (2) cathodal DC of the DLPFC; (3) intermittent anodal DC of the DLPFC and; (4) AC on the zygomatic process. We used weak currents of 1 to 2 mA (for DC experiments) or 0.1 to 0.2 mA (for AC experiment). Results: We found no significant changes in electroencephalogram, cognition, mood, and pain between groups and a low prevalence of mild adverse effects (0.11% and 0.08% in the active and sham stimulation groups, respectively), mainly, sleepiness and mild headache that were equally distributed between groups. Conclusions: Here, we show no neurophysiological or behavioral signs that transcranial DC stimulation or AC stimulation with weak currents induce deleterious changes when comparing active and sham groups. This study provides therefore additional information for researchers and ethics committees, adding important results to the safety pool of studies assessing the effects of cortical stimulation using weak electrical currents. Further studies in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders are warranted.