Movimento ortodôntico depois de tratamento endodôntico, inclusive com perfuração: 30 dias

Um questionamento muito frequente: qual o tempo que se deve esperar para movimentar um dente submetido a tratamento endodôntico, inclusive os de perfuração radicular? A extrapolação dos fenômenos observados em outras regiões da raiz e a fundamentação experimental com base em situações correlatas permitem afirmar que 30 dias correspondem a um período mais do que razoável para o reparo periapical estar em fase avançada de maturação e síntese. As forças ortodônticas são muito leves e dissipantes - muito mais do que o traumatismo dentário, o trauma oclusal e as forças mastigatórias normais -, e não devem interferir na patogenicidade e virulência das microbiotas envolvidas nas necroses e lesões periapicais crônicas, assim como não devem interferir nos fenômenos celulares e teciduais durante a reorganização dos tecidos apicais e periapicais.

In adults: 47.2% have periodontitis! How about in orthodontic patients?

The occurrence of chronic inflammatory periodontal disease due to dental plaque in adults over 30 years of age was noticed in 47.2% of the 3,742 subjects studied, representing a 64.7 million people population in the 50 states of the U.S. and the District of Columbia. The methods used by the authors were uniquely precise and the results brought us to great insight on the correlation between orthodontic treatment and periodontal health, which is described below.

Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the dentoskeletal changes of patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with either the Jasper jumper appliance or the activator-headgear combination, both associated with fixed appliances. Methods: The sample comprised 72 subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion divided into 3 groups: group 1 included 25 subjects treated with fixed appliances and the force modules of the Jasper jumper at an initial mean age of 12.72 years, group 2 included 25 subjects treated with the activator-headgear combination followed by fixed appliances at an initial mean age of 11.07 years, and group 3 included 22 untreated subjects at an initial mean age of 12.67 years. Initial cephalometric characteristics and dentoskeletal changes were compared with analysis of variance. Results: Both experimental groups had similar dentoskeletal changes: restrictive effect on the maxilla, clockwise mandibular rotation and a slight increase in anterior face height, retrusion of the maxillary incisors, distalization of the maxillary molars, protrusion of the mandibular incisors, extrusion of the mandibular molars, and significant improvements of the maxillomandibular relationship, overjet, overbite, and the molar relationship. Conclusions: The effects of the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination followed by fixed orthodontic appliances were similar in Class II malocclusion treatment.

Bracket/wire play: what to expect from tipping prescription on pre-adjusted appliances

INTRODUCTION: The opinion on the 'straight-wire' concept has been evolving since its origin, characterized by faithful followers or absolute skepticism. Currently, it seems reasonable to state that most professionals have a more realistic and critical viewpoint, with an attitude that reveals Orthodontics' maturity and greater knowledge on the technique. The most relevant criticisms refer to the impossibility of the both the Straight-Wire and the Standard systems to completely express the characteristics related to the brackets due to mechanical deficiencies, such as bracket/wire play. OBJECTIVES: A critical analysis of this relationship, which is unclear due to lack of studies, was the scope of this paper. METHODS: The compensatory treatment of two patients, using Capelozza's individualized brackets, works as the scenery for cephalometric evaluation of changes in incisor inclination produced by different dimensions of leveling archwires. RESULTS: The evaluation of these cases showed that, while the introduction of a 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless steel archwire in a 0.022 x 0.030-in slot did not produce significant changes in incisor inclination, the 0.021 x 0.025-in archwire was capable of changing it, mainly in mandibular incisors, and in the opposite direction to the compensation. CONCLUSION: Considering compensatory treatments, even when using an individualized prescription according to the malocclusion, the bracket/wire play seems to be a positive factor for malocclusion correction, without undesirable movements. Therefore, it seems reasonable to admit that, until a bracket system can have absolute individualization, the use of rectangular wires that still have a certain play with the bracket slot is advisable.

Abordagem ortodôntica dos pacientes com fissuras labiopalatinas

As características das más-oclusões de pacientes com fissura labiopalatal em geral guardam correlação com a classificação da malformação, levando a diferentes níveis de gravidade e prognóstico para o tratamento ortodôntico. Desta forma, serão apresentados casos clínicos exemplificando os tipos de fissura e suas particularidades nas condutas terapêuticas, demonstrando ainda, a importância da Ortodontia no preparo dos pacientes para realização de enxerto ósseo alveolar e cirurgia ortognática.