Assessment of Preemptive Analgesia Efficacy in Surgical Extraction of Third Molars

Background and objectives: Literature on preemptive analgesia is controversial. Reliability of results and difficult reproducibility of research contribute for non-elucidation of the subject. The aim of this study is to test the efficacy of oral ketoprofen (150 mg) preemptively administrated two days before third molar surgery, compared with postoperative administration in the same patient. Methods: Thirteen patients underwent surgical removal of bilateral third molar in two separate procedures. In a random and double blind procedure, oral ketoprofen 150 mg was administered every 12 hours two days before surgery and, after the procedure, the same drug was administered for three days. On the other side, a control (placebo) was used orally every 12 hours two days before surgery and, after the procedure, ketoprofen 150 mg was administered every 12 hours for three days. Postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue scale, nominal scale, and amount of rescue analgesics consumed. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between the preemptive treatment and control. Conclusion: In this experimental model, preemptive analgesia was not effective in reducing postoperative pain in surgical extraction of third molar compared with the postoperative administration of the same drug.

A possible role to nitric oxide in the anti-inflammatory effects of amitriptyline

Antidepressants are reported to display anti-inflammatory effects. Nitric oxide (NO), in turn, has a key role in inflammation. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of amitriptyline co-administered with L-NAME (a NO synthase inhibitor) on certain parameters of acute inflammatory response in rats, as a form to investigate a possible participation of NO in the anti-inflammatory effects of amitriptyline. For this, two animal models were used: carrageenan-induced paw edema and acute peritonitis. In the last one, peritoneal exudate, adhesion molecules expression by peripheral blood leukocytes and serum cytokines levels were evaluated. In a noninflammatory condition, serum levels of nitrates were determined. L-NAME induced a potentiation of the anti-inflammatory effects of amitriptyline (p < 0.05) in the paw edema model; however, these effects were not abrogated when L-NAME was substituted by L-arginine administration. A decrease in both leukocyte concentration and total number of cells in the peritoneal exudate and a reduction in the total serum levels of nitrates were observed with co-administration of L-NAME and amitriptyline (p < 0.05). No significant differences among groups were found concerning the expression of adhesion molecules by peripheral blood leukocytes (p > 0.05). There was a significant decrease on IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha serum levels in the experimental groups when compared to the control animals. Together the present results and the literature suggest that the anti-inflammatory effects of amitriptyline may be due to a decrease in NO production. A decrease in IL-1 beta/TNF-alpha serum levels may also be implicated in the results observed.

Cost effectiveness of OptiMal® rapid diagnostic test for malaria in remote areas of the Amazon Region, Brazil

Abstract Background In areas with limited structure in place for microscopy diagnosis, rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) have been demonstrated to be effective. Method The cost-effectiveness of the Optimal® and thick smear microscopy was estimated and compared. Data were collected on remote areas of 12 municipalities in the Brazilian Amazon. Data sources included the National Malaria Control Programme of the Ministry of Health, the National Healthcare System reimbursement table, hospitalization records, primary data collected from the municipalities, and scientific literature. The perspective was that of the Brazilian public health system, the analytical horizon was from the start of fever until the diagnostic results provided to patient and the temporal reference was that of year 2006. The results were expressed in costs per adequately diagnosed cases in 2006 U.S. dollars. Sensitivity analysis was performed considering key model parameters. Results In the case base scenario, considering 92% and 95% sensitivity for thick smear microscopy to Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax, respectively, and 100% specificity for both species, thick smear microscopy is more costly and more effective, with an incremental cost estimated at US$549.9 per adequately diagnosed case. In sensitivity analysis, when sensitivity and specificity of microscopy for P. vivax were 0.90 and 0.98, respectively, and when its sensitivity for P. falciparum was 0.83, the RDT was more cost-effective than microscopy. Conclusion Microscopy is more cost-effective than OptiMal® in these remote areas if high accuracy of microscopy is maintained in the field. Decision regarding use of rapid tests for diagnosis of malaria in these areas depends on current microscopy accuracy in the field.