1 resultado para Automated proof
em Université de Montréal
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (6)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (86)
- Boston University Digital Common (5)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (66)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (43)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (31)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- CUNY Academic Works (6)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (17)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (6)
- Harvard University (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (37)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (8)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (10)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open University Netherlands (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (9)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (13)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (98)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (132)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (24)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (20)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (7)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (100)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (35)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
Resumo:
We model social choices as acts mapping states of the world to (social) outcomes. A (social choice) rule assigns an act to every profile of subjective expected utility preferences over acts. A rule is strategy-proof if no agent ever has an incentive to misrepresent her beliefs about the world or her valuation of the outcomes; it is ex-post efficient if the act selected at any given preference profile picks a Pareto-efficient outcome in every state of the world. We show that every two-agent ex-post efficient and strategy-proof rule is a top selection: the chosen act picks the most preferred outcome of some (possibly different) agent in every state of the world. The states in which an agent’s top outcome is selected cannot vary with the reported valuations of the outcomes but may change with the reported beliefs. We give a complete characterization of the ex-post efficient and strategy-proof rules in the two-agent, two-state case, and we identify a rich class of such rules in the two-agent case.