1 resultado para open data
em Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Repository Napier (2)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (12)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (12)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (35)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (6)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (13)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (16)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (58)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (4)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (38)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (15)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (48)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (40)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (19)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (12)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (74)
- Duke University (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Harvard University (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (2)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (10)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (5)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- Projetos e Dissertações em Sistemas de Informação e Gestão do Conhecimento (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (182)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (6)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (26)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (6)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (22)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (16)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (6)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (6)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (11)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (45)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (3)
- Universidade de Madeira (1)
- Universidade do Minho (4)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (5)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (7)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (32)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (9)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (12)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (40)
- University of Washington (3)
Resumo:
Aim. Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA) is widely performed for the treatment of acute appendicitis. However the use of laparoscopic approach for complicated appendicitis is controversial, in particular because it has been reported an increased risk of postoperative IntraAbdominal Abscess (IAA). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of LA versus Open Appendectomy (OA) in the treatment of complicated appendicitis, especially with regard to the incidence of postoperative IAA. Patients and Methods. A retrospective study of all patients treated at our institution for complicated appendicitis, from May 2004 to June 2009, was performed. Data collection included demographic characteristics, postoperative complications, conversion rate, and length of hospital stay. Results. Thirty-eight patients with complicated appendicitis were analysed. Among these, 18 (47,3%) had LA and 20 (52,7%) had OA. There were no statistical differences in characteristics between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative IAA was higher (16,6%), although not statistically significant, in the LA compared with OA group (5%). On the other hand the rate of wound infection was lower (5%) in the LA versus OA (20%). Conclusion. Our study indicated that LA should be utilised with caution in case of perforated appendicitis, because it is associated with an increased risk of postoperative IAA compared with OA.