1 resultado para demographic characteristics
em Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (13)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (4)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- Bioline International (8)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (29)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (12)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (17)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (47)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- Duke University (3)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (10)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (20)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (331)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (3)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (5)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (59)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo España (2)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (24)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (10)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (2)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (8)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (15)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (9)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (17)
- University of Washington (4)
Resumo:
Aim. Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA) is widely performed for the treatment of acute appendicitis. However the use of laparoscopic approach for complicated appendicitis is controversial, in particular because it has been reported an increased risk of postoperative IntraAbdominal Abscess (IAA). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of LA versus Open Appendectomy (OA) in the treatment of complicated appendicitis, especially with regard to the incidence of postoperative IAA. Patients and Methods. A retrospective study of all patients treated at our institution for complicated appendicitis, from May 2004 to June 2009, was performed. Data collection included demographic characteristics, postoperative complications, conversion rate, and length of hospital stay. Results. Thirty-eight patients with complicated appendicitis were analysed. Among these, 18 (47,3%) had LA and 20 (52,7%) had OA. There were no statistical differences in characteristics between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative IAA was higher (16,6%), although not statistically significant, in the LA compared with OA group (5%). On the other hand the rate of wound infection was lower (5%) in the LA versus OA (20%). Conclusion. Our study indicated that LA should be utilised with caution in case of perforated appendicitis, because it is associated with an increased risk of postoperative IAA compared with OA.