1 resultado para Maternal demographic characteristics
em Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (14)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (171)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (2)
- Bioline International (9)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (33)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (22)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (13)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (23)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (57)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (6)
- Duke University (4)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (5)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (4)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (4)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (6)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (24)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (5)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (8)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (71)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (14)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo España (2)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (48)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (28)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade do Minho (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (10)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (2)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (82)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (15)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (10)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (93)
- University of Washington (5)
Resumo:
Aim. Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA) is widely performed for the treatment of acute appendicitis. However the use of laparoscopic approach for complicated appendicitis is controversial, in particular because it has been reported an increased risk of postoperative IntraAbdominal Abscess (IAA). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of LA versus Open Appendectomy (OA) in the treatment of complicated appendicitis, especially with regard to the incidence of postoperative IAA. Patients and Methods. A retrospective study of all patients treated at our institution for complicated appendicitis, from May 2004 to June 2009, was performed. Data collection included demographic characteristics, postoperative complications, conversion rate, and length of hospital stay. Results. Thirty-eight patients with complicated appendicitis were analysed. Among these, 18 (47,3%) had LA and 20 (52,7%) had OA. There were no statistical differences in characteristics between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative IAA was higher (16,6%), although not statistically significant, in the LA compared with OA group (5%). On the other hand the rate of wound infection was lower (5%) in the LA versus OA (20%). Conclusion. Our study indicated that LA should be utilised with caution in case of perforated appendicitis, because it is associated with an increased risk of postoperative IAA compared with OA.