1 resultado para Execute
em Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository
Filtro por publicador
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (12)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (12)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (7)
- Biblioteca Digital Loyola - Universidad de Deusto (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (10)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (18)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (21)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (48)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (3)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (3)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Harvard University (2)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco - Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (36)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (3)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (4)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (5)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (8)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (8)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (6)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (3)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (4)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (83)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (26)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (5)
- Scielo Uruguai (2)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (12)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (43)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade do Minho (5)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (11)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (40)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (9)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (9)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Michigan (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (11)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Introduction. Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery (SEPS) enables the direct visualization and section of perforating veins. Morbidity and duration of hospitalization are both less than with conventional open surgery (Linton’s or Felder’s techniques). Patients and methods. A total of 322 legs from 285 patients with a mean age of 56 years (range 23-90) were treated at our Department from May 1996 to January 2010. In 309 cases, an endoscope (ETM Endoskopische Technik GmbH, Berlin, Germany) was introduced through a transverse incision approximately 1.5 cm in length and 10 cm from the tibial tuberosity, as with Linton’s technique. A spacemaker balloon dissector for SEPS, involving a second incision 6 cm from the first, was used in only 13 cases. Results. The procedure used in each case was decided on the basis of preoperative evaluation. SEPS and stripping were performed in 238 limbs (73.91%), SEPS and short stripping in 7 limbs (2.17%), SEPS and crossectomy in 51 limbs (15.84%), and SEPS alone in 26 limbs (8.07%). 103 patients presented a total of 158 trophic ulcers; the healing time was between 1 and 3 months, with a healing rate of 82.91% after 1 month and 98.73% after 3 months. Conclusion. Subfascial ligature of perforating veins is superior to sclerotherapy and minimally invasive suprafascial treatment for the treatment of CVI. It is easy to execute, minimally invasive and has few complications.