Compressão pneumática intermitente na prevenção de trombose venosa profunda em pacientes cirúrgicos: revisão sistemática e metanálise

Introdução: Trombose Venosa Profunda (TVP) é o resultado de inúmeros fatores, incluindo estase venosa, injuria endotelial e hipercoagulação do sangue. O embolismo pulmonar é a maior complicação da TVP e ocorre quando um trombo ou um coágulo sangüíneo desloca-se em direção aos pulmões. O tromboembolismo é um sério problema de saúde e é responsável por um considerável número de mortes súbitas e por significantes custos de hospitalizações em todo o mundo. Entre os métodos profiláticos usados na prevenção da TVP, há os classificados como mecânicos e os farmacológicos. Ambos são efetivos e podem ser usados sempre que necessário, tendo sido recomendados por consenso internacional. Objetivos: Avaliar a incidência da TVP em pacientes cirúrgicos através da Compressão pneumática Intermitente CPI (coxa/perna ou perna/pé) contra nenhuma forma de profilaxia ou contra fármacos. Métodos: Revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados, utilizando a metodologia Cochrane, através de buscas eletrônica e manual. Foram incluídos pacientes cirúrgicos, de ambos os sexos, cuja intervenção foi o uso de aparelhos de compressão pneumática intermitente. Resultados: 4269 pacientes cirúrgicos investigados por 31 ensaios submetidos a um número de intervenções cirúrgicas, incluindo cirurgia ortopédica (joelho e quadris), geral, ginecológica, urológica e neurológica. Dados combinados demonstraram efeitos de tratamento virtualmente iguais entre CPI e abordagens farmacológicas [0.95 (95%CI 0.82, 1.10)], em relação à incidência de TVP. Entretanto, o risco de hemorragia foi maior e estatisticamente significante em pacientes tratados com intervenções farmacológicas [0.37(95%CI 0.20, 0.69)]. Conclusão: Comparações entre as estratégias farmacológicas e mecânicas indicam que ambas são similares na prevenção de trombose venosa profunda. Entretantio, a evidência atual suportaria a escolha das abordagens mecâncias, uma vez que o risco de eventos hemorrágicos favorece os métodos mecânicos.

Effects of melatonin on ovarian follicles

Objective: To evaluate the histomorphometry and expression of Ki-67 and c-kit in ovarian follicles of pinealectomized or melatonin-treated pinealectomized rats.Study design: Forty adult rats were randomly divided into four groups of 10 animals: Group I - control; Group II - sham-pinealectomized; Group III - pinealectomized (Px), and Group IV - Px treated with melatonin (10 mu g/night, per animal). After two months' treatment, on the night of proestrous, the animals were placed in metabolic cages for night urine collection and subsequent measurement of 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (6-SMT). the rats were anesthetized, blood samples were taken for estrogen and progesterone determinations, and they were then euthanized. the ovaries were dissected out for further histological and immunohistochemical analyses. Data were first submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) complemented with the Tukey-Kramer test for multiple comparisons (P < 0.05).Results: the urinary levels of 6-SMT and serum progesterone were lower in the Px group (GIII). Exogenous melatonin treatment restored both blood melatonin and 6-SMT urinary levels. the histomorphometric data in Group III revealed a significant increase of degenerating antral and nonantral follicles with regard to the other groups. in addition no corpora lutea were observed in this group. No significant differences were noticed regarding the number of corpora lutea among the other groups (I, II and IV), but the number of cells and the thickness of the theca interna of Px animals (Group III) were higher than in the other groups. Conversely, the density of progesterone receptors (fmol/g) in the ovaries of Group III was significantly lower than in the other groups.Conclusion: Our data indicate that melatonin exerts a role on the maintenance of a proper follicular function, and is thus important for ovulation and progesterone production. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Orthodontic and orthopaedic treatment for anterior open bite in children

BackgroundAnterior open bite occurs when there is a lack of vertical overlap of the upper and lower incisors. the aetiology is multifactorial including: oral habits, unfavourable growth patterns, enlarged lymphatic tissue with mouth breathing. Several treatments have been proposed to correct this malocclusion, but interventions are not supported by strong scientific evidence.ObjectivesThe aim of this systematic review was to evaluate orthodontic and orthopaedic treatments to correct anterior open bite in children.Search methodsThe following databases were searched: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 14 February 2014); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)(The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 1); MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 14 February 2014); EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 14 February 2014); LILACS via BIREME Virtual Health Library (1982 to 14 February 2014); BBO via BIREME Virtual Health Library (1980 to 14 February 2014); and SciELO (1997 to 14 February 2014). We searched for ongoing trials via ClinicalTrials.gov (to 14 February 2014). Chinese journals were handsearched and the bibliographies of papers were retrieved.Selection criteriaAll randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of orthodontic or orthopaedic treatments or both to correct anterior open bite in children.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently assessed the eligibility of all reports identified.Risk ratios (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous data. the continuous data were expressed as described by the author.Main resultsThree randomised controlled trials were included comparing: effects of Frankel's function regulator-4 (FR-4) with lip-seal training versus no treatment; repelling-magnet splints versus bite-blocks; and palatal crib associated with high-pull chincup versus no treatment.The study comparing repelling-magnet splints versus bite-blocks could not be analysed because the authors interrupted the treatment earlier than planned due to side effects in four of ten patients.FR-4 associated with lip-seal training (RR = 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.38)) and removable palatal crib associated with high-pull chincup (RR = 0.23 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.48)) were able to correct anterior open bite.No study described: randomisation process, sample size calculation, there was not blinding in the cephalometric analysis and the two studies evaluated two interventions at the same time. These results should be therefore viewed with caution.Authors' conclusionsThere is weak evidence that the interventions FR-4 with lip-seal training and palatal crib associated with high-pull chincup are able to correct anterior open bite. Given that the trials included have potential bias, these results must be viewed with caution. Recommendations for clinical practice cannot be made based only on the results of these trials. More randomised controlled trials are needed to elucidate the interventions for treating anterior open bite.