1 resultado para Level 3 evidence
em Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (3)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (13)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (10)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (20)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (22)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (10)
- Bioline International (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (114)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (36)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (16)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (5)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (51)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (4)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (8)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (6)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (11)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (3)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (23)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (15)
- Nottingham eTheses (4)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (7)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (51)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (46)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (172)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (7)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional dos Hospitais da Universidade Coimbra (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (39)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (23)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (12)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (8)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (10)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (12)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (16)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
Breast region measurements are important for research, but they may also become significant in the legal field as a quantitative tool for preoperative and postoperative evaluation. Direct anthropometric measurements can be taken in clinical practice. the aim of this study was to compare direct breast anthropometric measurements taken with a tape measure and a compass.Forty women, aged 18-60 years, were evaluated. They had 14 anatomical landmarks marked on the breast region and arms. the union of these points formed eight linear segments and one angle for each side of the body. the volunteers were evaluated by direct anthropometry in a standardized way, using a tape measure and a compass.Differences were found between the tape measure and the compass measurements for all segments analyzed (p > 0.05).Measurements obtained by tape measure and compass are not identical. Therefore, once the measurement tool is chosen, it should be used for the pre- and postoperative measurements in a standardized way.This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. for a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.