Terapia hormonal para criptorquidia com hormônio gonadotrofina coriônica humana (HCG): ensaio clínico randomizado duplo-cego placebo controlado

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o efeito do tratamento hormonal do hormônio Gonadotrofina Coriônica Humana (HCG), em dois esquemas posológicos diferentes, ao placebo quanto sua efetividade e segurança no tratamento da Criptorquidia. Métodos: Este estudo é um ensaio clínico randomizado, duplo-cego, placebo-controlado de 14 semanas. A amostra de 92 pacientes que foram randomizados para o grupo-HCG dias alternados, denominados de Grupo G1 (N = 29), para o grupo HCG a cada quatro dias, denominados Grupo G4 (N= 33) e o grupo-placebo, denominados como Grupo O(N = 30). 2. Os desfechos clínicos primários para este estudo foram 1) Cura, 2) Melhora, 3) Não Cura. Os desfechos complementares foram: 4) Efeitos adversos, 5) Níveis séricos hormonais. Resultados: Não existiram diferenças entre os grupos HCG dias alternados, HCG a cada quatro dias e placebo para as medidas dos desfechos primários. 1) Cura: G1: 3/29(3,3%), G4: 4/33(4,3%) e O: 3/30(3,3%) 2) Melhora: G1:3/29(3,3%), G4: 1/33(1,1%) e O: 3/30(3,3%). 3) Não Cura: G1: 23/29(25%), G4: 28/33(30,4%) e O: 24/30(26,1%) p=0,815. 4) Os efeitos adversos mais freqüentes em nossa amostra foram: Aumento do numero de ereções: não foi possível avaliar. 5) Níveis séricos hormonais: Testosterona sérica: G1: de 34,15 ± 5,8ng/ml; G4: 49,6± 5,6 ng/ml e O: 7,5± 3,5ng/ml. Hormônio Luteinizante (LH): G1: 0,22± 0,2 , G4: 0,07±0,1 e O: 0,08±0,02 Hormônio Folículo Estimulante (FSH): G1: 0,88±0,16, G4: 0,3±0,1 e O 1,15±0,6. Conclusão: Não foi encontrada nenhuma diferença estatística no tratamento com HCG, independente da posologia adotada, e placebo. Os autores concluem a hormonioterapia com HCG não demonstrou superioridade na eficácia e ou segurança no tratamento da criptorquidia ao placebo.

Low-level laser therapy and light-emitting diode effects in the secretion of neuropeptides SP and CGRP in rat skin

The phototherapy effects in the skin are related to biomodulation, usually to accelerate wound healing. However, there is no direct proof of the interrelation between the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and light-emitting diode (LED) in neuropeptide secretion, these substances being prematurely involved in the neurogenic inflammation phase of wound healing. This study therefore focused on investigating LLLT and LED in Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP) secretion in healthy rat skin. Forty rats were randomly distributed into five groups with eight rats each: Control Group, Blue LED Group (470 nm, 350 mW power), Red LED Group (660 nm, 350 mW power), Red Laser Group (660 nm, 100 mW power), and Infrared Laser Group (808 nm, 100 mW power) (DMCA (R) Equipamentos Ltda., So Carlos, So Paulo, Brazil). the skin of the animals in the experimental groups was irradiated using the punctual contact technique, with a total energy of 40 J, single dose, standardized at one point in the dorsal region. After 14 min of irradiation, the skin samples were collected for CGRP and SP quantification using western blot analysis. SP was released in Infrared Laser Group (p = 0.01); there was no difference in the CGRP secretion among groups. Infrared (808 nm) LLLT enhances neuropeptide SP secretion in healthy rat skin.

Ototoxicity evaluation in medulloblastoma patients treated with involved field boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a retrospective review

Background: Ototoxicity is a known side effect of combined radiation therapy and cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of medulloblastoma. the delivery of an involved field boost by intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may reduce the dose to the inner ear when compared with conventional radiotherapy. the dose of cisplatin may also affect the risk of ototoxicity. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the impact of involved field boost using IMRT and cisplatin dose on the rate of ototoxicity.Methods: Data from 41 medulloblastoma patients treated with IMRT were collected. Overall and disease-free survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method Hearing function was graded according to toxicity criteria of Pediatric Oncology Group (POG). Doses to inner ear and total cisplatin dose were correlated with hearing function by univariate and multivariate data analysis.Results: After a mean follow-up of 44 months (range: 14 to 72 months), 37 patients remained alive, with two recurrences, both in spine with CSF involvement, resulting in a disease free-survival and overall survival of 85.2% and 90.2%, respectively. Seven patients (17%) experienced POG Grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Cisplatin dose was a significant factor for hearing loss in univariate analysis (p < 0.03). in multivariate analysis, median dose to inner ear was significantly associated with hearing loss (p < 0.01). POG grade 3 and 4 toxicity were uncommon with median doses to the inner ear bellow 42 Gy (p < 0.05) and total cisplatin dose of less than 375 mg/m(2) (p < 0.01).Conclusions: IMRT leads to a low rate of severe ototoxicity. Median radiation dose to auditory apparatus should be kept below 42 Gy. Cisplatin doses should not exceed 375 mg/m(2).