Evolution of genome sequencing techniques

The quality and the speed for genome sequencing has advanced at the same time that technology boundaries are stretched. This advancement has been divided so far in three generations. The first-generation methods enabled sequencing of clonal DNA populations. The second-generation massively increased throughput by parallelizing many reactions while the third-generation methods allow direct sequencing of single DNA molecules. The first techniques to sequence DNA were not developed until the mid-1970s, when two distinct sequencing methods were developed almost simultaneously, one by Alan Maxam and Walter Gilbert, and the other one by Frederick Sanger. The first one is a chemical method to cleave DNA at specific points and the second one uses ddNTPs, which synthesizes a copy from the DNA chain template. Nevertheless, both methods generate fragments of varying lengths that are further electrophoresed. Moreover, it is important to say that until the 1990s, the sequencing of DNA was relatively expensive and it was seen as a long process. Besides, using radiolabeled nucleotides also compounded the problem through safety concerns and prevented the automation. Some advancements within the first generation include the replacement of radioactive labels by fluorescent labeled ddNTPs and cycle sequencing with thermostable DNA polymerase, which allows automation and signal amplification, making the process cheaper, safer and faster. Another method is Pyrosequencing, which is based on the “sequencing by synthesis” principle. It differs from Sanger sequencing, in that it relies on the detection of pyrophosphate release on nucleotide incorporation. By the end of the last millennia, parallelization of this method started the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) with 454 as the first of many methods that can process multiple samples, calling it the 2º generation sequencing. Here electrophoresis was completely eliminated. One of the methods that is sometimes used is SOLiD, based on sequencing by ligation of fluorescently dye-labeled di-base probes which competes to ligate to the sequencing primer. Specificity of the di-base probe is achieved by interrogating every 1st and 2nd base in each ligation reaction. The widely used Solexa/Illumina method uses modified dNTPs containing so called “reversible terminators” which blocks further polymerization. The terminator also contains a fluorescent label, which can be detected by a camera. Now, the previous step towards the third generation was in charge of Ion Torrent, who developed a technique that is based in a method of “sequencing-by-synthesis”. Its main feature is the detection of hydrogen ions that are released during base incorporation. Likewise, the third generation takes into account nanotechnology advancements for the processing of unique DNA molecules to a real time synthesis sequencing system like PacBio; and finally, the NANOPORE, projected since 1995, also uses Nano-sensors forming channels obtained from bacteria that conducts the sample to a sensor that allows the detection of each nucleotide residue in the DNA strand. The advancements in terms of technology that we have nowadays have been so quick, that it makes wonder: ¿How do we imagine the next generation?

In situ characterization of porous VPO catalysts with fibrous structure: Identifying the redox behavior and the stability of active sites

Two VPO materials with fibrillar morphology have been prepared by the aid of electrospinning technique. One is a VPO carbon-supported material (VCF200) with fibrous morphology and very high surface area that is stable under oxidizing conditions up to 350C. The other material is a bulk mixed VPO oxide (VPO500) with fibrous structure obtained after optimizing the calcination of the carbon support in VCF200. Despite it is a bulk oxide material, this material exhibits a high surface area (> 60 m2/g). The redox behavior of both samples was monitored by in situ Raman spectroscopy under oxidation/reduction cycles. For the dehydrated supported sample (VCF200), the pyrophosphate phase (VO)2P2O7 (Raman ~930 cm-1) is detected, which has been described as the active phase (see Figure (a) below). This phase is quite stable since it does not disappear upon subsequent oxidation/reduction cycles. Under reduction conditions at 125C, in consecutive cycles, additional Raman bands appear at ~1090 cm-1 that are characteristic of the αII-VOPO4 phase. On the other hand, the bulk phases show a reversible behavior under redox cycles (Figure (b)). Under reducing conditions, a Raman band appears at ~980 cm-1 (β-VPO phase), whereas under oxidation conditions some segregation to VOx oxides occurs. Nevertheless, this segregation is reversible and the β-VPO phase forms again under reducing conditions. Thus, these results demonstrate that the active VPO phases of these fibrous catalysts are quite stable, and that their structure is reversible under several redox cycles, which make them suitable as oxidation catalysts.