4 resultados para Organizational Cooperation
em Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal
Resumo:
Organizational Cooperation (OC) is a current concept that responds to the growing interdependence among individuals and teams. Likewise, Knowledge Management (KM) accompanies specialization in all sectors of human activity. Most KM processes are cooperation-intensive, and the way both constructs relate to each other is relevant in understanding organizations and promoting performance. The present paper focuses on that relationship. The Organizational Cooperation Questionnaire (ORCOQ) and the Short form of the Knowledge Management Questionnaire (KMQ-SF) were applied to 639 members of research and development (R&D) organizations (Universities and Research Institutes). Descriptive, correlational, linear multiple regression and multivariate multiple regression analyses were performed. Results showed significant positive relationships between the ORCOQ and all the KMQ-SF dimensions. The prediction of KMQ-SF showed a large effect size (R2 = 62%). These findings will impact on how KM and OC are seen, and will be a step forward in the development of this field.
Resumo:
O objectivo do presente trabalho foi verificar as diferenças entre grupos, quanto à cooperação, numa amostra de 300 funcionários de 70 Câmaras Municipais, nas variáveis tempo de trabalho, função desempenhada, área de trabalho, idade, sexo e habilitações académicas. Utilizámos o Questionário de Cooperação Organizacional. Não observámos diferenças significativas nas variáveis tempo de serviço, área de trabalho, idade, sexo e habilitações académicas em nenhum dos três factores do QCO (cooperação configurada por regulamentações formais, cooperação decorrente da interdependência de indivíduos únicos articulados entre si, e cooperação através da orientação para a sociedade dos contributos singulares). Na variável função desempenhada, não houve diferenças significativas no primeiro nem no terceiro factores. No segundo factor, observámos uma diferença significativa entre administrativos (que referem que se coopera pouco) e ocupantes de cargos de direcção e chefia (que referem que se coopera moderadamente). As variáveis estudadas não são, em geral, pertinentes para a diferenciação dos processos de cooperação. /ABSTRACT: The aim of this dissertation was to test the differences between groups, concerning cooperation, on a random sample with 300 workers from 70 municipalities, focusing on the variables working time, task, working department, age, gender and qualifications. We used the Questionnaire on Organizational Cooperation. No significant differences in the variables working time, working department, age, gender, and qualifications in any of the three dimensions of the QOC (cooperation shaped by formal regulations; cooperation arising from the interdependence of unique individuals articulated with one another; cooperation towards society, arising from the individual action) were found. We found no significant differences in the variable task, neither in the first nor in the third factor. ln the second factor, we observed a significant difference between clerks (who state that cooperation is little) and workers in leading and management positions (who state that cooperation is moderate). The variables that were studied are not generally relevant to the differentiation of the cooperation processes.
Resumo:
O presente estudo apresenta as qualidades psicométricas do Questionário de Cooperação Organizacional (QCO). A amostra é constituída por 300 funcionários camarários, dos departamentos de Atendimento e Urbanismo, de 70 Câmaras Municipais de Portugal Continental. Recorreu-se a procedimentos de Análise Factorial Exploratória, método de Máxima Verosimilhança, Scree Test, com método de rotação Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. Os resultados demonstram que o QCO é capaz de medir 3 dimensões da cooperação organizacional, explicando 49,36% da variância total. Os valores de consistência interna foram bastante satisfatórios, com a dimensão 1 “Cooperação configurada por regulamentações formais" a apresentar um Alpha de Cronbach de 0,875, a dimensão 2, "Cooperação decorrente da interdependência de indivíduos únicos articulados entre si" com 0,864 e a dimensão 3 "Cooperação através da orientação para a sociedade dos contributos singulares" com 0,787. /ABSTRACT: This study presents the analysis of psychometric properties of the Questionário de Cooperação Organizacional (QCO) (Organizational Cooperation Questionnaire). lt was applied to a sample of 300 employees from the Reception and Urbanization departments of 70 continental portuguese town-halls. Procedures of Exploratory Factorial Analysis, Maximum Likelihood extraction method and Varimax with Kaiser Normalization rotation method were performed. Results indicate that the QCO is capable of measuring 3 organizational cooperation dimensions, which explain 49,36% of the total variance. Reliability statistics were very satisfactory, in which dimension 1 "Cooperation structured by formal regulamentation" has a Cronbach's Alpha of 0,875, dimension 2, "The cooperation originated from the interdependence by the articulation amongst unique individuals" 0,864, and dimension 3 "Orientation to society of singular contribution through cooperation" 0,787.
Resumo:
In the early modern period, trade became a truly global phenomenon. The logistics, financial and organizational complexity associated with it increased in order to connect distant geographies and merchants from different backgrounds. How did these merchants prevent their partners from dishonesty in a time where formal institutions and legislation did not traverse these different worlds? This book studies the mechanisms and criteria of cooperation in early modern trading networks. It uses an interdisciplinary approach, through the case study of a Castilian long-distance merchant of the sixteenth century, Simon Ruiz, who traded within the limits of the Portuguese and Spanish overseas empires. Early Modern Trading Networks in Europe discusses the importance of reciprocity mechanisms, trust and reputation in the context of early modern business relations, using network analysis methodology, combining quantitative data with qualitative information. It considers how cooperation and prevention could simultaneously create a business relationship, and describes the mechanisms of control, policing and punishment used to avoid opportunism and deception among a group of business partners. Using bills of exchange and correspondence from Simon Ruiz’s private archive, it charts the evolution of this business network through time, debating which criteria should be included or excluded from business networks, as well as the emergence of standards. This book intends to put forward a new approach to early modern trade which focuses on individuals interacting in self-organized structures, rather than on states or empires. It shows how indirect reciprocity was much more frequent than direct reciprocity among early modern merchants and how informal norms, like ostracism or signaling, helped to prevent defection and deception in an effective way.