1 resultado para Linguistic interferences
em Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (2)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (13)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (10)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (84)
- Aston University Research Archive (37)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (10)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (86)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (63)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (10)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (51)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (46)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (5)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (7)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (110)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (10)
- Línguas & Letras - Unoeste (14)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (8)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (7)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (5)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (27)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (177)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (12)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (4)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Michigan (15)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (21)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
Resumo:
This paper describes various experiments done to investigate author profiling of tweets in 4 different languages – English, Dutch, Italian, and Spanish. Profiling consists of age and gender classification, as well as regression on 5 different person- ality dimensions – extroversion, stability, agreeableness, open- ness, and conscientiousness. Different sets of features were tested – bag-of-words, word ngrams, POS ngrams, and average of word embeddings. SVM was used as the classifier. Tfidf worked best for most English tasks while for most of the tasks from the other languages, the combination of the best features worked better.