Is the human population a large-scale indicator of the species richness of ground beetles?

Aim Positive regional correlations between biodiversity and human population have been detected for several taxonomic groups and geographical regions. Such correlations could have important conservation implications and have been mainly attributed to ecological factors, with little testing for an artefactual explanation: more populated regions may show higher biodiversity because they are more thoroughly surveyed. We tested the hypothesis that the correlation between people and herptile diversity in Europe is influenced by survey effort

Influência dos obstáculos de pequena dimensão na estruturação dos agrupamentos piscícolas: The impact of small physical obstacles on the structure of freshwater fish assemblages

O efeito das grandes barragens na comunidade piscícola vem sendo documentado por numerosos estudos, enquanto o número de trabalhos que incidem sobre o efeito dos obstáculos de pequena dimensão é bastante mais reduzido. A comunidade piscícola foi amostrada e as variáveis ambientais foram caracterizadas em 28 locais divididos por dois cursos de água da Península Ibérica, 14 dos quais localizados imediatamente a montante, jusante e entre cinco pequenos obstáculos na Ribeira de Muge e 14 na Ribeira de Erra, considerada a linha de água de referência. Através de análise estatística multivariada foi possível verificar que variáveis de habitat como a velocidade de corrente e a profundidade, e não as variáveis físico-químicas, foram as principais responsáveis pela discriminação dos vários grupos de locais nas duas ribeiras. A ribeira de referência exibiu um gradiente longitudinal de velocidade de corrente que, contudo, não era suficientemente forte para causar alterações significativas na composição e estrutura dos agrupamentos piscícolas. Através da sucessiva e drástica repetição deste gradiente junto a cada estrutura, a ribeira com obstáculos apresentou diferenças na fauna piscícola entre os três tipos de locais. Os troços lênticos a montante apresentavam uma densidade mais elevada de espécies limnofilicas, omnívoras e exóticas, como o góbio (Gobio lozanoi), que estão bem adaptadas a este tipo de habitat. Os locais de amostragem situados a jusante e entre os obstáculos caracterizavam-se pela dominância de taxa reófilos e invetivo-os (i.e. barbo, Luciobarbus bocagei). As métricas relacionadas com a riqueza específica não apresentaram diferenças entre os três tipos de locais, ao contrário da diversidade que foi mais elevada nos pontos situados entre os obstáculos, afastados da sua influência directa, onde a diversidade de habitats também é mais elevada. Contrariamente aos locais a montante, os troços a jusante e entre os obstáculos apresentaram similaridades, em muitas das características estudadas, com a ribeira de referência, sugerindo que este tipo de estruturas provoca uma alteração mais significativa na comunidade piscícola a montante. Este estudo sugere que os efeitos dos pequenos obstáculos no habitat e na ictiofauna são, em parte, semelhantes aos descritos para as grandes barragens, fornecendo considerações importantes para os esforços de conservação dos ecossistemas ribeirinhos. ABSTRACT; Many studies have assessed the effects of large dams on fishes but few have examined the effects of small obstacles. Fishes were sampled and environmental variables were characterized at 28 sites in two lberian streams, 14 located immediately downstream, upstream and between five small obstacles at River Muge and 14 at River Erra, considered as the reference stream. Multivariate analysis indicated that habitat variables like current velocity and depth, but not physicochemistry, were the main responsible for site groups' discrimination in both streams. The reference stream exhibited a longitudinal gradient of current velocity that, however, wasn't strong enough to cause significant changes in the fish assemblage's composition and structure. By successive and drastically repeating this gradient near each structure, the obstac1es stream presented differences in fish fauna between the three site types. Lentic upstream sites presented higher density of limnophilic, omnivorous and exotic species, like gudgeon Gobio lozanoi, who are well adapted to this type of habitat. Downstream and between obstacles sites were characterized by the dominance of rheophilic and invertivorous taxa, especially barbel Luciobarbus bocagei. Richness metrics did not differ among site types, but diversity was higher in sites located between the obstacles away from its direct influence, where the habitat diversity was higher. Contrarily to upstream sites, downstream and between obstacles sites were similar in many of the studied features to the reference stream, implying that this type of structures cause a higher modification in the upstream fish community. This study suggests that the effects of small obstacles on habitat and fishes are similar, in some extent, to those reported for larger dams, providing important considerations for riverine ecosystem conservation efforts.

Large scale underground energy storage for renewables integration: general criteria for reservoir identification and viable technologies.

The increasing integration of renewable energies in the electricity grid contributes considerably to achieve the European Union goals on energy and Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions reduction. However, it also brings problems to grid management. Large scale energy storage can provide the means for a better integration of the renewable energy sources, for balancing supply and demand, to increase energy security, to enhance a better management of the grid and also to converge towards a low carbon economy. Geological formations have the potential to store large volumes of fluids with minimal impact to environment and society. One of the ways to ensure a large scale energy storage is to use the storage capacity in geological reservoir. In fact, there are several viable technologies for underground energy storage, as well as several types of underground reservoirs that can be considered. The geological energy storage technologies considered in this research were: Underground Gas Storage (UGS), Hydrogen Storage (HS), Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES), Underground Pumped Hydro Storage (UPHS) and Thermal Energy Storage (TES). For these different types of underground energy storage technologies there are several types of geological reservoirs that can be suitable, namely: depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, aquifers, salt formations and caverns, engineered rock caverns and abandoned mines. Specific site screening criteria are applicable to each of these reservoir types and technologies, which determines the viability of the reservoir itself, and of the technology for any particular site. This paper presents a review of the criteria applied in the scope of the Portuguese contribution to the EU funded project ESTMAP – Energy Storage Mapping and Planning.