Um café pela natureza, qual a melhor opção

O café é originário das florestas tropicais da Etiópia e do Sudão, crescendo sobre uma canópia diversa. Devido ao facto de haver uma tendência para o desaparecimento do sombreamento tradicional e consequente perda de biodiversidade, os sistemas de certificação oferecem a oportunidade de aproximar objectivos económicos, sociais e ambientais de modo a beneficiar os agricultores. Este estudo tem como objectivo dar a conhecer a todos os intervenientes da cadeia de custódia, principalmente aos consumidores, qual a certificação que podem optar por se a sua principal preocupação quando tomam um café for a natureza. Caracterizou-se o valor ecológico do sistema de produção sustentável e do sistema convencional. Analisaram-se e comparam-se os diferentes critérios ambientais dos sistemas de certificação, através da construção de uma matriz. Os resultados sugerem que a certificação que melhor responde ao pretendido é a Rainforest Alliance, no entanto, a dupla ou tripla certificação parecem ser também boas opções. ABSTRACT; Coffee originates in Ethiopia and Sudan’s ram forests, growing above a diverse canephora. Due to the fact that there is a tendency to the vanishing of traditional shadowing and consequent loss of biodiversity, certification schemes offer the opportunity of bringing together economical, social and environmental goals allowing benefits to farmers. This study aims to bring cognizance to every intervenient of the custody chain, mainly to consumers, which certification scheme to choose if their major concern when drinking a coffee is nature. The ecological value of sustainable production system has been characterized as well as the conventional system. Different environmental criteria of certification schemes have been analysed and compared trough the construction of an evaluation template. Results suggest that the certification that better suits the desired goal is the Rainforest Alliance, but double or triple certification also appear as options that might be followed.

Contributo da agricultura de conservação na prevenção do encharcamento e dos riscos de halomorfização dos solos argilosos na cultura de milho na área de influência de Alqueva

This study aims to evaluate the contribution of no-till (SD) and cover crops (CC) in mitigating the risk of salinity / sodicity of the soil. We tested whether the increase of soil infiltration rate and the reduction of the direct evaporation, achieved with a high amount of residues on the soil surface from the CC followed by SD, would enable a smaller accumulation of salts during the summer and more leaching of salt during winter. The experiment The experiment included two tillage systems: no-till associated to a winter cover crop (SD / CC) and the conventional system (SC) (chisel and disc harrows), divided into two water regimes and two levels of water salinity (0.7 dS m-1 and 2.0 dS m-1), both with adsorption sodium ratio 3. Contrary to expectations CC showed a tendency to increase salt content in Fall-Winter period, due to the reduction of the fraction available to leaching, but showed advantages in reducing long term salt content due to the improved structure of the B horizon, because decreases the tendency to the reduction of the structure of this horizon, caused typically by the permanent high moisture content during.