1 resultado para COMPLEXITY
em Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (4)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Argos - Repositorio Institucional de la Secretaría de Investigación y Postgrado de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Nacional de Misiones (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (40)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (53)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (60)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (48)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (20)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- CUNY Academic Works (5)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (14)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (2)
- Düsseldorfer Dokumenten- und Publikationsservice (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (73)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (5)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (16)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Open University Netherlands (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (6)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (107)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (159)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (26)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (26)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Michigan (8)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (48)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (9)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Background Complex medication regimens may adversely affect compliance and treatment outcomes. Complexity can be assessed with the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI), which has proved to be a valid, reliable tool, with potential uses in both practice and research. Objective To use the MRCI to assess medication regimen complexity in institutionalized elderly people. Setting Five nursing homes in mainland Portugal. Methods A descriptive, cross-sectional study of institutionalized elderly people (n = 415) was performed from March to June 2009, including all inpatients aged 65 and over taking at least one medication per day. Main outcome measure Medication regimen complexity index. Results The mean age of the sample was 83.9 years (±6.6 years), and 60.2 % were women. The elderly patients were taking a large number of drugs, with 76.6 % taking more than five medications per day. The average medication regimen complexity was 18.2 (±SD = 9.6), and was higher in the females (p < 0.001). The most decisive factors contributing to the complexity were the number of drugs and dosage frequency. In regimens with the same number of medications, schedule was the most relevant factor in the final score (r = 0.922), followed by pharmaceutical forms (r = 0.768) and additional instructions (r = 0.742). Conclusion Medication regimen complexity proved to be high. There is certainly potential for the pharmacist’s intervention to reduce it as part as the medication review routine in all the patients.