Relatório da prática de ensino supervisionada realizado no agrupamento de escolas nº e de Évora na escola básica integrada André de Resende e na escola Secundária Gabriel Pereira

O presente relatório elaborado no âmbito da disciplina da Prática de Ensino Supervisionada, do Mestrado em Ensino de Artes Visuais no 3° Ciclo do Ensino Básico e Secundário, é referente à Prática de Ensino Supervisionada no primeiro e segundos semestres do ano lectivo 2009/201O. Prática que se desenvolveu na Escola Básica Integrada André de Resende com a orientadora cooperante Professora Maria João Machado, e na Escola Secundária Gabriel Pereira com a orientadora cooperante professora Luísa Gancho. Ambas as acções foram supervisionadas sob a orientação do Professor Doutor Leonardo Charréu. Para além dos Professores Orientadores, o presente núcleo n°2 constituiu-se pelos mestrandos, Eliezer Correia e Cátia Casquinha. O relatório da disciplina da Prática de Ensino Supervisionada divide-se em duas secções. A primeira secção que resulta da reflexão do que foi executado no primeiro semestre na Escola Básica Integrada André de Resende, e a segunda secção que corresponde ao segundo semestre na Escola Secundária Gabriel Pereira, ambas localizadas na cidade de Évora. ABSTRACT: The present report was realized to cover the activities developed in the curricular unit Supervised Teaching Practice ("Prática de Ensino Supervisionada"), of the Master in Visual Arts Teaching, in the 3rd Cycle of Basic and Secondary Education. lt is relative to the “Prática de Ensino Supervisionada” developed in the two semesters of the academic year 2009/201O held at the "Escola Básica Integrada André de Resende", cooperating with the advisor local teacher Maria João Machado, and at the "Escola Secundária Gabriel Pereira", with the advisor local teacher Luísa Gancho. 8oth actions were supervised under the guidance and scientific supervision of Professor Leonardo Charréu. Beyond these advisor teachers, the group N°2 was formed by the master students, Eliezer Correia and Cátia Casquinha. The report of the discipline of "Prática de Ensino Supervisionada" is divided into two sections. The first section that results from the reflection of the activity executed in the first semester at the "Escola Básica Integrada André de Resende", and the second section correspond to the second semester at the "Escola Secundária Gabriel Pereira”, both located in the city of Évora.

Relatório da prática de ensino supervisionada em ensino de artes visuais no 3º ciclo do ensino básico e no ensino secundário

Este relatório foi elaborado no âmbito do mestrado em Ensino de Artes Visuais no 3.° Ciclo do Ensino Básico e no Secundário, na Universidade de Évora (UE). Reporta-se à unidade curricular Prática de Ensino Supervisionada (PES) realizada nas Escolas EBI André de Resende e na Escola Secundária Gabriel Pereira, em Évora, no ano lectivo 2009-201O. O Prof. Doutor Leonardo Charréu (UE), orientador científico, os professores orientadores cooperantes Paulo Matias e Carlos Guerra, constituíram o apoio ao núcleo de estágio das alunas Cristina Malta e Ana Sofia Henriques (autora deste relatório). O Prof. Doutor Leonardo Charréu assistiu a quatro aulas nas disciplinas de Educação Visual e Desenho A. O relatório da PES relata os objectivos de trabalho, planificações, metodologias e instrumentos de avaliação nas disciplinas de Educação Visual e Desenho A e nas actividades extracurriculares realizadas. Teve como intuito, também, elaborar uma análise reflexiva do trabalho desenvolvido na aprendizagem da PES. ABSTRACT: This report was developed during the Master in Visual Arts Teaching in the 3 rd Basic Cycle and Secondary Education at the Évora University. The Supervised Teaching Practice unit (referred under de Portuguese acronym PES) was completed at the EBI André de Resende School and at the Secondary School Gabriel Pereira, in Évora, in 2009-2010. The Professor Leonardo Charréu (UE), Scientific Supervisor and the teachers/local supervisors Paulo Matias and Carlos Guerra, supported the internship of the master students Cristina Malta and Ana Sofia Henriques. Professor Leonardo Charréu observed four lessons in Visual Education and Drawing A disciplines. The PES report describes the work objectives, planning, methodologies, and evaluation methods in the Visual Education and Drawing A subjects and the extra-curricular activities. The objective was also to develop a reflective analysis of the work made during the entire learning period of PES.

Rethinking Le Corbusier: Urban Design and History

It is generally assumed that Le Corbusier’s urban planning made a break with the past, and that the public spaces designed by him had nothing to do with anything that existed before – a conviction fostered by both the innovative character of his proposals and by the proliferation in his manifestos of watchwords that mask any evocation of the past – words like civilisation machiniste, l’esprit nouveau, l’architecture de demain. However, in his writings, Le Corbusier often mentioned the powerful analogy that exists between the architecture of other times and the logic of modern production. Vers une architecture, for example, contains a mixture of photographs showing silos, cars, aeroplanes, ships (i.e. the fruits of 19th and 20th century civil architecture and mechanical engineering) alongside photographs of Greek and Roman buildings. While Le Corbusier, at the end of the 1920s, claimed “I have only one teacher: the past; only one education: the study of the past”, a series of sketches in the first volume of the Œuvre complète, done during his youth at the archaeological sites visited during his Grand Tour, shows that his interest in the past went far beyond a simple reference.

Journal of Architecture and Urbanism - Rethinking Le Corbusier: Urban Design and History

This is much more than a mere compilation of texts about Corbusian architecture. The articles gathered here focus on Le Corbusier’s reflections about the public space of earlier times and its influence upon his own output, the relationship of his designs with the pre-existing city, and other subjects drawn from all periods of his career and training that clarify the affinity that he established with the past through urban design. They are very heterogeneous, pointing off in different directions and marking the most diverse interests. But at the same time they are interconnected, in that they seek to shed light on the affinity that Le Corbusier established with the past from the point of view of urban design, and open up new perspectives about the public space in his work and its controversial relationship with history. This special issue thus bears witness once again to Le Corbusier’s inexhaustible legacy, but also to the usefulness of research on his work and thought – a subject about which it seemed that everything had already been said when, paradoxically, we now know that there is still almost everything left to say.