3 resultados para Aquifer vulnerability
em Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal
Resumo:
O principal objectivo desta dissertação é a aplicação de métodos empíricos para proceder à caracterização da vulnerabilidade à contaminação do Sistema Aquífero de Évora Montemor-Cuba, nomeadamente os índices DRASTIC, de Susceptibilidade (IS), GOD e o método EPPNA. A aplicação destes índices permitiu concluir que o Sistema Aquífero de Évora-Montemor-Cuba apresenta a maioria da sua área classificada com um índice de vulnerabilidade à contaminação baixo a moderadamente baixo, enquanto os aquíferos carbonatados apresentam grande parte da sua área classificada com um índice moderadamente alto a alto. O IS revelou-se uma ferramenta extremamente útil para ter uma visão espacial do território do ponto de vista da sua vulnerabilidade, quando associada aos usos do solo. No entanto, a complexidade dos sistemas naturais é sempre maior do que as simplificações necessárias para se poderem utilizar as ferramentas que permitem calcular estes índices, existindo permanentemente imprecisões associadas a estes cálculos. ABSTRACT: The aim of this Project is to apply different methods regarding the assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution in the Évora-Montemor-Cuba aquifer, namely the DRASTIC, IS, GOD and EPPNA. The greater area of the Évora-Montemor-Cuba aquifer has a vulnerability to pollution classified as low or moderate to low, while in the limestones aquifers the biggest area is classified as moderate to high or high. The IS index is a very useful tool to provide a spatial intuition of the territory, considering its vulnerability, when associated with the land use. However, the natural systems complexity is bigger than the necessary simplifications introduced in order to use these indexes, nevertheless there are permanent inaccuracies related to these results.
Resumo:
A Flood Vulnerability Index (FloodVI) was developed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and a new aggregation method based on Cluster Analysis (CA). PCA simplifies a large number of variables into a few uncorrelated factors representing the social, economic, physical and environmental dimensions of vulnerability. CA groups areas that have the same characteristics in terms of vulnerability into vulnerability classes. The grouping of the areas determines their classification contrary to other aggregation methods in which the areas' classification determines their grouping. While other aggregation methods distribute the areas into classes, in an artificial manner, by imposing a certain probability for an area to belong to a certain class, as determined by the assumption that the aggregation measure used is normally distributed, CA does not constrain the distribution of the areas by the classes. FloodVI was designed at the neighbourhood level and was applied to the Portuguese municipality of Vila Nova de Gaia where several flood events have taken place in the recent past. The FloodVI sensitivity was assessed using three different aggregation methods: the sum of component scores, the first component score and the weighted sum of component scores. The results highlight the sensitivity of the FloodVI to different aggregation methods. Both sum of component scores and weighted sum of component scores have shown similar results. The first component score aggregation method classifies almost all areas as having medium vulnerability and finally the results obtained using the CA show a distinct differentiation of the vulnerability where hot spots can be clearly identified. The information provided by records of previous flood events corroborate the results obtained with CA, because the inundated areas with greater damages are those that are identified as high and very high vulnerability areas by CA. This supports the fact that CA provides a reliable FloodVI.
Resumo:
Collision with vehicles is an important source of bird mortality, but it is uncertain why some species are killed more often than others. Focusing on passerines,we testedwhether mortality is associated with bird abundances, and with traits reflecting flight manoeuvrability, habitat, diet, and foraging and social behaviours. We also tested whether the species most vulnerable to road-killing were scarcer near (b500 m) or far (N500–5000 m) from roads. During the breeding seasons of 2009–2011,we surveyed roadkills daily along 50 km of roads, and estimated bird abundances from 74 point counts. After correcting for phylogenetic relatedness, there was strong correlation between roadkill numbers and the abundances of 28 species counted near roads. However, selectivity indices indicated that Blue tit (Parus caeruleus), Blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla) and European goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) were significantly more road-killed than expected from their abundances, while the inverse was found for seven species. Using phylogenetic generalised estimating equations, we found that selectivity indexes were strongly related to foraging behaviour and habitat type, and weakly so to body size, wing load, diet and social behaviour. The most vulnerable passerines were foliage/bark and swoop foragers, inhabiting woodlands, with small body size and low wing load. The species most vulnerable to road collisions were not scarcer close to roads. Overall, our study suggests that traits provide a basis to identify the passerine species most vulnerable to road collisions, which may be priority targets for future research on the population-level effects of roadkills.