Estilos pessoais dos terapeutas e estilos de vinculação

Neste estudo, procurou-se estudar a relação entre estilos pessoais e estilos de vinculação na relação terapêutica, procurando também, identificar outros aspetos que influenciam quer os estilos pessoais quer os estilos de vinculação duma amostra de psicoterapeutas. Esta amostra foi constituída por 40 licenciados em Psicologia Clínica, de ambos os sexos, com diferentes anos de experiência profissional. Os instrumentos utilizados foram o Questionário do Estilo pessoal (EPT) e a Escala de Vinculação de Adultos (EVA). Os resultados apontaram para uma associação entre a função instrutiva do EPT e o estilo de vinculação (terapeutas rígidos apresentam um estilo de vinculação ambivalente, enquanto que os terapeutas flexíveis apresentam um estilo de vinculação seguro), e entre algumas das funções do EPT com a orientação teórica, o grupo etário dos clientes e o género dos terapeutas. Conclui-se que a forma como os terapeutas estabelecem e regulam as suas sessões, está associada ao estilo de vinculação. ABSTRACT: ln this study, the priority goal was to identify which type of relationship exist between personnel styles and attachment styles in the therapeutic relationship; still point a characterization and a recognition of what aspects that can influence it, and then analyse it. The sample were constituted by 40 psychotherapists, they have a licenciature degree in clinical psychology, and the years of professional experience or the duration that they have the degree don't matter. The questionnaire EPT-C and the Adult attachment Scale-R (AAS-R). The results point to the association between the instructive function and attachment styles, as to the EPT-C functions with theoric orientation, age groups of clients, and therapists genres. The therapists that are rigids show a ambivalent style; but therapists flexible shows a secure style of attachment. lndeed the way as therapists stablish and regulate their sessions, is associated to the attachment style.

the health and well-being of nursing students in clinical practice . what prevents it? what promotes it?

Introduction: The training of nursing students in the context of clinical practice, is characterized by educational experiences, subject to various emotional stress (stress, ambivalence, frustration, conflict), sometimes making it very vulnerable student.However not all students use the same strategies minimizing their meanings and negative effects on the level of your health and well-being Objetiv:To analyze the perception that nursing students have about the determinants of their health status and well-being in clinical practice Methods: Exploratory research Results:The results reveal the complexity of the teaching / learning process in clinical practice, identified determinants that limit and / or promote health and well-being of students, or not contributing to their motivation, self-confidence and learning. All students value the presence of the following dimensions: affective-emotional (humanization in learning experiences); relational dynamics (interactions developed with all stakeholders); methods used (professional competence of the clinical supervisor and teacher); school curriculum (adaptation of learning in theory); socialization to the profession (become nurse).Conclusions: The results indicate, that although all students evidencing the dimensions described as fundamental to learning in clinical practice, the study results are dichotomous and ambivalent. Students 2nd and 3ºanos refer a low perception in clinical practice, the indicated dimensions, and for these source of concern and uncertainty in learning, such as limiting their health condition and well-being. For students of the 4th year, these dimensions are percecionadas as gifts, and sources of motivation, learning and catalysts such as promoting their health and well-being.