Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life using the EQ-5D-3L in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The daily experience with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has significant adverse effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). HRQoL assessment is essential for measuring the impact of the disease on the patient and selecting individualized strategies. Generic measures for assessing HRQoL are very useful because, unlike specific measurement instruments, they allow for the comparison with other instruments. The EQ-5D-3L is a generic measure and it describes HRQoL in five dimensions; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, with three levels each. In Portugal, studies using the EQ-5D-3L as a generic measure to assess HRQoL in diabetic patients are scarce. Objective: To assess HRQoL in individuals with T2DM using the Portuguese version of the EQ-5D-3L. Methodology: An accidental sample of patients with T2DM (n=437) was selected at Family Health Units and healthcare centers in Coimbra, Portugal, between January 2013 and January 2014. The EQ-5D-3L was applied in interviews. The EQ-5D-3L score was calculated based on the answers to the five dimensions and the value system for the Portuguese population. Results: In this sample, 100% of the participants answered the EQ-5D-3L. The HRQoL score was 0.6772 in the EQ-5D-3L and 64.85 in the EQ-VAS. The most frequent answers to the five dimensions were no problems or some problems. The mean score of the EQ-5D-3L was significantly associated with age, male gender, high level of education, having an occupation, practicing physical activity, being single and having been diagnosed with T2DM for less time. The Cronbach alpha's value was 0.674, confirming an acceptable internal consistency. Conclusion: HRQoL levels in individuals with T2DM are lower than the national average and vary depending on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The EQ-5D-3L is a reliable instrument that can be used to assess the quality of life of diabetic patients and contribute to assess the patients' overall health status, adding data from the subjective dimension of self-care management.

Autocuidado dos adolescentes com diabetes mellitus tipo 1: responsabilidade no controlo da doença

Enquadramento: A diabetes mellitus tipo 1 (DM1) é uma doença cada vez mais prevalente na adolescência. Intervir no autocuidado é determinante para a gestão da doença. Objetivos: Determinar a responsabilidade dos adolescentes com DM1 nos papéis de autocuidado; analisar a relação da responsabilidade dos adolescentes com DM1 nos papéis de autocuidado com a idade e o género. Metodologia: Estudo descritivo-analítico e transversal. Participaram 51 adolescentes entre os 12 e os 18 anos seguidos em hospitais distritais da zona centro de Portugal. Foi aplicada uma escala de responsabilidade nos papéis de autocuidado, constituída por 15 itens distribuídos por 4 dimensões: manutenção da saúde; controlo da doença; diagnóstico, tratamento e medicação na DM1; e participação em serviços de saúde. Resultados: A maioria dos adolescentes assume responsabilidade própria elevada. O género não influencia a responsabilidade global, os rapazes evidenciam maior nível de responsabilidade na gestão de administração de insulina. Conclusão: Os adolescentes assumem responsabilidade própria no controlo da doença, evidencia-se responsabilidade partilhada com os pais ou outros no global e na participação em serviços de saúde.

Qualidade de vida da pessoa com diabetes mellitus - uma revisão integrativa da literatura

A Diabetes Mellitus é uma doença crónica que interfere em vários aspetos da vida diária da pessoa, podendo afetar a sua Qualidade de Vida, e que pelo aumento da sua incidência e prevalência, representa um problema de Saúde Pública. Surge daí a relevância do seu estudo, tendo como ponto de partida as questões de investigação: "De que forma é que a Diabetes Mellitus interfere na Qualidade de Vida da pessoa?"; "Que intervenções podem ser usadas pelo enfermeiro, na promoção de Qualidade de Vida da pessoa com Diabetes Mellitus?" e como objetivos: Identificar qual a influência da Diabetes Mellitus na Qualidade de Vida da pessoa; Identificar intervenções adotadas pelo enfermeiro, na promoção da Qualidade de Vida na pessoa com Diabetes Mellitus. A pesquisa efetuou-se nas bases de dados Academic Search Complete, CINAHLPlus, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, SciELO, PubMed e RCAAP, com os descritores "quality of life", "diabetes mellitus", "nursing care", "adult", "qualidade de vida" e "diabetes", e utilizada a estratégia P[I][C]OD, sendo selecionados 12 artigos. Evidenciou-se o impacto negativo da Diabetes Mellitus na Qualidade de Vida da pessoa em várias dimensões, bem como variáveis, comorbilidades e complicações associadas, e intervenções fundamentais para ajudar a pessoa a adotar estratégias eficazes no ajustamento à doença.

Autocuidado dos Adolescentes com Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1: Conhecimento acerca da Doença

Enquadramento: A diabetes mellitus tipo 1 (DM 1) é uma doença cada vez mais prevalente na adolescência. O controlo da doença no âmbito do autocuidado revela-se de grande valor na conquista da autonomia dos adolescentes e na diminuição dos riscos associados. Objectivos: Analisar o conhecimento dos adolescentes diabéticos acerca da doença e dos cuidados; verificar a relação do conhecimento dos adolescentes com DM1 acerca da doença e dos cuidados com a idade e o sexo. Metodologia: Estudo descritivo-analítico e transversal. Participaram 51 adolescentes com idades entre os 12 e os 18 anos, seguidos em consultas de diabetologia de hospitais da zona centro de Portugal, tendo-se aplicado um teste de conhecimentos. Resultados: Relativamente ao conhecimento, no global e em 3 das 5 dimensões, a maioria dos adolescentes demonstrou conhecimento de nível bom, todavia foram identificados conceitos erróneos tendo-se registado adolescentes com baixo nível de conhecimentos. Verificam-se correlações positivas do conhecimento com a idade dos adolescentes. Conclusão: É importante corrigir os conceitos erróneos e identificar os adolescentes com conhecimento insuficiente, para uma intervenção dirigida.

Dificuldades no autocuidado dos adolescentes com diabetes mellitus tipo 1

Enquadramento: A diabetes mellitus tipo 1 (DM1) é uma doença cada vez mais prevalente na adolescência. Intervir no autocuidado é determinante para o seu controlo. Objetivos: Determinar as dificuldades no autocuidado dos adolescentes com DM1. Analisar a relação das dificuldades no autocuidado dos adolescentes com DM1 com a idade e o género. Metodologia: Estudo descritivo-analítico e transversal. Participaram 51 adolescentes entre os 12 e os 18 anos, seguidos em hospitais distritais da zona centro de Portugal. Foi construído um questionário de dificuldades adaptado de um modelo de papéis de autocuidado, constituído por 18 itens distribuídos por 4 dimensões: Manutenção da saúde; Controlo da doença; Diagnóstico, tratamento e Medicação na DM1 e, participação nos serviços de saúde. Resultados: Referem ter pouca dificuldade em gerir o autocuidado (96,1%), bastante dificuldade no ajuste de insulina mediante a avaliação de glicemia capilar (29,4%), bastante dificuldade em reconhecer a importância da hemoglobina glicosilada (17,6%). Conclusão: Os adolescentes revelaram níveis de dificuldade relevantes no ajuste de insulina e na compreensão da hemoglobina glicosilada.

The use of motivational interviews by nurses to promote health behaviors in adolescents: a scoping review protocol

Adolescents - defined as young people between 10 and 19 years of age1 - are, in general, a relatively healthy segment of the population.2 However, the developmental changes that take place during adolescence may affect their subsequent risk for diseases and for a variety of health-related behaviors. In fact, early onset of preventable health problems (e.g. obesity, malnutrition, STDs) and the engagement in health risk behaviors (e.g., sedentary life style, excessive alcohol consumption, unprotected sex) during adolescence, are likely to put them at greater risk for physical and mental health problems at a later stage in life. Moreover, health related problems and health risk behaviors may disrupt adolescents' physical and cognitive development and therefore may affect their ability to think and act in relation to decisions about their health in the future.1 In summary, health-related behaviors in adolescence, apart from their influence on the continuum of "health-disease", they also have the potential to influence future behaviors. In fact, several studies have shown that past behaviors are good predictors of future behaviors .3,4 Thus, promoting healthy practices during adolescence and taking measures to better protect young people from health risks are essential for the prevention of health problems in adulthood.5 According to the World Health Organization, the main problems affecting young people include mental health problems (such as behavioral disorders, eating disorders, suicide, anxiety or depression), the use of substances (illegal substances, alcohol and tobacco), interpersonal violence, nutrition (a proper nutrition consists of healthy eating habits and physical exercise), unintentional injuries (which are a leading cause of death and disability among young people, with road traffic injuries accounting for about 700 deaths per day), sexual and reproductive health (for example, risky sexual behaviors, early pregnancy and childbirth) and HIV (resulting from sexual transmission and drug injection).5,6 On the other hand, the number of children and youth with chronic health conditions has increased dramatically in the past four decades7 as larger numbers of chronically ill children survive beyond the age of 10.8 Despite the lack of data on adolescents' health making it difficult to determine the prevalence of chronic illnesses in this age group9, it is known that one in ten adolescents suffers from a chronic condition worldwide.10 In fact, national population based studies from Western countries show that 20-30% of teenagers have a chronic illness, defined as one that lasts longer than six months.8 The most prevalent chronic illness among adolescents is asthma and the one with the highest incidence is diabetes mellitus, particularly type II.9 Traditionally, healthcare professionals have been mainly investing in health education activities, through the transmission of knowledge with a view to creating habits, customs and behaviors, and promoting healthy lifestyles. However, empowering people does not only consist of giving them the right information11 , i.e. good information is not enough to cause people to make changes.12 The motivation or desire to change unhealthy behaviors and habits depends on many factors, namely intrinsic motivation, control over personal decisions, self-confidence and perception of effectiveness, personal ambivalence, and individualized assistance.12 Many professionals assume that supplying knowledge is sufficient for behavioral changes; however, even very good advice often fails to generate behavioral change. After all, people continue to engage in unhealthy behaviors despite clearly knowing what they should do and how to change. "What is lacking is the motivation to apply that knowledge".13, p.1233 In fact, behavioral change is a complex phenomenon with multiple determinants that also includes motivational variables. It is associated with ambivalent processes expressed in the dilemma between keeping the current status and moving on to new ways of acting. For example, telling adolescents that if they keep on engaging in a certain behavior, they are increasing the risk of developing a long-term condition such as cardiovascular disease, stroke or diabetes is rarely enough to trigger the desired behavioral change; people are more likely to change when they believe that the change is really effective and that they are able to implement it.12 Therefore, it is essential to provide specific training for "healthcare professionals to master motivational techniques, avoid confrontation with the users, and facilitate behavioral changes".14 In this context, motivating patients to make behavioral changes is also an important nursing task where change in lifestyle is a major element of patients' treatment and preventive interventions.15 One of the nurse's goals is to help improve a patient's health or help them to manage existing health conditions. Once nurses are in a position where they have to focus on accomplishing tasks and telling patients what needs to be accomplished16, the role of the nurse is expanding even more into the use of motivational strategies.17 MI is bringing nurses back to therapeutic communication and moving them closer to successful health promotion and disease management, by promoting behavior change and empowering their patients. As the nursing profession evolves, MI is seen as a challenge and the basis of nurse's interactions with individuals, families and communities.16, 17 In the same way, MI may be taken as an essential tool in the provision of nursing care to adolescents, being itself a workspace with possible therapeutic effects regarding problems, clarification of doubts, and development of skills.18 In fact, MI may be particularly applicable in work with adolescents because of their specific developmental stage. Adolescents attempt to establish their own autonomy and identity while struggling with social interactions and moral issues, which leads to ambivalence.19 Consistent with the developmental challenges during adolescence, "MI explicitly honors autonomy, people's right and irrevocable ability to decide about their own behavior"20 while allowing the person to explore possibilities for change of risky or maladaptive behaviours.19 MI can be defined as a directive, client-centred counselling style for eliciting behavior change by helping clients to explore and resolve ambivalence. It is most centrally defined not by technique but by its spirit as a facilitative style of interpersonal relationship.21 It is a set of strategies and techniques widely used in clinical practice based on the transtheoretical model of change. The Stages of Change model describes five stages of readiness—precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance—and provides a framework for understanding behavior change.22 The MI has been widely tested and applied in different areas, such as modification of addictive behaviors, interventions with offenders in the context of justice, eating disorders, promotion of therapeutic adherence among chronic patients, promotion of learning in school settings or intervention with adolescents at risk.18,23 In general, clinical practice has been adopting the perspective of motivation as something relatively immutable, i.e., the adolescent is either motivated for change/treatment and, in these conditions, the professional's role is to help him/her, or the adolescent is not motivated and then change/treatment is not feasible. Alternatively the theoretical model underlying the MI technique postulates that the individual's adherence to change/treatment depends on his/her motivation, which can change throughout the therapeutic intervention. As several studies found positive results for effects of MI24-26 and its use by health professionals is encouraged23,27 nurses may play an important role in patients' process of change. As nurses have a crucial role in clinical contexts, they can facilitate the process of ending risk behaviors and/or adopting positive health behaviors through some motivational techniques, namely with adolescents. A considerable number of systematic reviews about MI already exist pointing to some benefits of its use in the treatment of a broad range of behavioral problems and diseases.13,28,29 Some of the current reviews focus on examining the effectiveness of MI for adolescents with diverse health risks/problems 30-32. However, to date there are no reviews that present and assess the evidence for the use of nurse-led MI in adolescents. Therefore, we have little knowledge of what works for whom (which adolescent subpopulation) under what circumstances (in which setting, for what problem) in relation to motivational interviewing by nurses. There is a clear need for scoping or mapping the use of MI by nurses with adolescents to identify evidence gaps and to inform opportunities for future development in nursing practice. On the other hand, information regarding nurse-led implemented and evaluated interventions, techniques and/or strategies used, contexts of application and adolescents subpopulation groups is dispersed in the literature33-36 which impedes the formulation of precise questions about the effectiveness of those interventions conducted by nurses and therefore the realization of a systematic review. In other words, it is known that different kind of motivational interventions have been implemented in different contexts by nurses, however does not exist a map about all the motivational techniques and/or strategies used. Furthermore the literature does not clarify which is the role of nurses at cross professional motivational intervention implemented programs and finally the outcomes and evaluation of interventions are unclear. Thus, the practical implication of this mapping will be clarifying all these aspects. Without this clarification is not possible to proceed to the realization of a systematic review about the effectiveness of the use of motivational interviews by nurses to promote health behaviors in adolescents, in a particular context and/or health risk behavior; or regarding the effectiveness of certain technique and/or strategy of MI. Consequently, there are important questions about the nature of the evidence in this area that need to be answered before formulating a precise question of effectiveness. This scoping review aims to respond to these questions. An initial search of the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, , Database of promoting health effectiveness reviews (DoPHER), The Campbell Library, Medline and CINAHL, has revealed that currently there is no Scoping Review (published or in progress) on the subject. In this context, this scoping review will examine and map the published and unpublished research around the use of MI by nurses implemented and evaluated to promote health behaviors in adolescents; to establish its current extent, range and nature and identify its feasibility, outcomes and gaps in the evidence defining research priorities in this field. This scoping review will be informed by the JBI methodology37 that suggests a five stage methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews which includes: identifying the research question, searching for relevant studies, selecting studies, charting data, collating, summarizing and reporting the results.