1 resultado para Almost Optimal Density Function
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (4)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (14)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (6)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (68)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (28)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (104)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (39)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (11)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (80)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (11)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (40)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (5)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (8)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (6)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (9)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (4)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (27)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (7)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (7)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (28)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (4)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (103)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (20)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (5)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (45)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (5)
- Universidade do Minho (4)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universita di Parma (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (9)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (54)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (7)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (58)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
Despite the large applicability of the field capacity (FC) concept in hydrology and engineering, it presents various ambiguities and inconsistencies due to a lack of methodological procedure standardization. Experimental field and laboratory protocols taken from the literature were used in this study to determine the value of FC for different depths in 29 soil profiles, totaling 209 soil samples. The volumetric water content (θ) values were also determined at three suction values (6 kPa, 10 kPa, 33 kPa), along with bulk density (BD), texture (T) and organic matter content (OM). The protocols were devised based on the water processes involved in the FC concept aiming at minimizing hydraulic inconsistencies and procedural difficulty while maintaining the practical meaning of the concept. A high correlation between FC and θ(6 kPa) allowed the development of a pedotransfer function (Equation 3) quadratic for θ(6 kPa), resulting in an accurate and nearly bias-free calculation of FC for the four database geographic areas, with a global root mean squared residue (RMSR) of 0.026 m3·m-3. At the individual soil profile scale, the maximum RMSR was only 0.040 m3·m-3. The BD, T and OM data were generally of a low predicting quality regarding FC when not accompanied by the moisture variables. As all the FC values were obtained by the same experimental protocol and as the predicting quality of Equation 3 was clearly better than that of the classical method, which considers FC equal to θ(6), θ(10) or θ(33), we recommend using Equation 3 rather than the classical method, as well as the protocol presented here, to determine in-situ FC.