1 resultado para Algebraic ANRs
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (5)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (10)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (19)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (31)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (8)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (27)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (10)
- CaltechTHESIS (13)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (31)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (33)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (61)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (11)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (4)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- FAUBA DIGITAL: Repositorio institucional científico y académico de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (88)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (25)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (76)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (243)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (30)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (4)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (10)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (17)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (20)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (25)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (23)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Despite the large applicability of the field capacity (FC) concept in hydrology and engineering, it presents various ambiguities and inconsistencies due to a lack of methodological procedure standardization. Experimental field and laboratory protocols taken from the literature were used in this study to determine the value of FC for different depths in 29 soil profiles, totaling 209 soil samples. The volumetric water content (θ) values were also determined at three suction values (6 kPa, 10 kPa, 33 kPa), along with bulk density (BD), texture (T) and organic matter content (OM). The protocols were devised based on the water processes involved in the FC concept aiming at minimizing hydraulic inconsistencies and procedural difficulty while maintaining the practical meaning of the concept. A high correlation between FC and θ(6 kPa) allowed the development of a pedotransfer function (Equation 3) quadratic for θ(6 kPa), resulting in an accurate and nearly bias-free calculation of FC for the four database geographic areas, with a global root mean squared residue (RMSR) of 0.026 m3·m-3. At the individual soil profile scale, the maximum RMSR was only 0.040 m3·m-3. The BD, T and OM data were generally of a low predicting quality regarding FC when not accompanied by the moisture variables. As all the FC values were obtained by the same experimental protocol and as the predicting quality of Equation 3 was clearly better than that of the classical method, which considers FC equal to θ(6), θ(10) or θ(33), we recommend using Equation 3 rather than the classical method, as well as the protocol presented here, to determine in-situ FC.