Independent, marked associations of alleles of the insulin receptor and dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase-I genes with essential hypertension

1. There is evidence to suggest that essential hypertension is a polygenic disorder and that it arises from yet-to-be-identified predisposing variants of certain genes that influence blood pressure. The cloning of various hormone, enzyme, adrenoceptor and hormone receptor genes whose products are involved in blood pressure control and the identification of polymorphisms of these has permitted us to test their genetic association with hypertension. 2. Cross-sectional analyses of a number of candidate gene markers were performed in hypertensive and normotensive subjects who were selected on the basis of both parents being either hypertensive or normotensive, respectively, and the difference in total alleles on all chromosomes for each polymorphism between the hypertensive and normotensive groups was test by χ analysis with one degree of freedom. 3. A marked association was observed between hypertension and insertion alleles of polymorphisms of the insulin receptor gene (INSR) (P<0.0040) and the dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase-1 (angiotensin I-converting enzyme; kininase II) gene (DCP1) (P<0.0018). No association with hypertension was evident, however, for polymorphisms of the growth hormone, low-density lipoprotein receptor, renal kallikrein, α2- and β1-adrenoreceptor, atrial natriuretic factor and insulin genes. 4. All but one of the hypertensive subjects had at least one of the hypertension-associated alleles, and although subjects homozygous for both were three times more frequent in the hypertensive group, examination of the nine possible genotypes suggested that the INSR and DCP1 alleles are independent markers for hypertension. 5. The present results suggest that genetic variant(s) in close linkage disequilibrium with polymorphisms at INSR and DCP1 may be involved in part in the aetiology of essential hypertension.

Freedom to choose? Embryo selection, reproductive decision-making and the role of the state

Involving the biopsy of an eight-cell embryo, PGD has been hailed as a means of making reproductive decisions without having to face the heart-wrenching decision to abort an affected foetus. However, controversy around the kinds of traits for which testing can be done, and who has access to the technology, has led to questions about the way in which the technology is developing. Women who are allowed to access in vitro fertilisation (IVF) services can currently also access PGD in limited circumstances.

Book Review: "The Interface: IBM and the Transformation of Corporate Design, 1945-1975", John Harwood, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011

Within the history of twentieth-century design, there are a number of well-known objects and stories that are invoked time and time again to capture a pivotal moment or summarize a much broader historical transition. For example, Marcel Breuer’s Model B3 chair is frequently used as a stand-in for the radical investigations of form and new industrial materials occurring at the Bauhaus in the mid-1920s. Similarly, Raymond Loewy’s streamlined pencil sharpener has become historical shorthand for the emergence of modern industrial design in the 1930s. And any discussion of the development of American postwar “organic design” seems incomplete without reference to Charles and Ray Eames’s molded plywood leg splint of 1942. Such objects and narratives are dear to historians of modern design. They are tangible, photogenic subjects that slot nicely into exhibitions, historical surveys, and coffee-table best sellers...