Nonlinear secret sharing immune against cheating

The paper investigates the design of secret sharing that is immune against cheating (as defined by the Tompa-Woll attack). We examine secret sharing with binary shares and secrets. Bounds on the probability of successful cheating are given for two cases. The first case relates to secret sharing based on bent functions and results in a non-perfect scheme. The second case considers perfect secret sharing built on highly nonlinear balanced Boolean functions.

On algebraic immunity and annihilators

Algebraic immunity AI(f) defined for a boolean function f measures the resistance of the function against algebraic attacks. Currently known algorithms for computing the optimal annihilator of f and AI(f) are inefficient. This work consists of two parts. In the first part, we extend the concept of algebraic immunity. In particular, we argue that a function f may be replaced by another boolean function f^c called the algebraic complement of f. This motivates us to examine AI(f ^c ). We define the extended algebraic immunity of f as AI *(f)= min {AI(f), AI(f^c )}. We prove that 0≤AI(f)–AI *(f)≤1. Since AI(f)–AI *(f)= 1 holds for a large number of cases, the difference between AI(f) and AI *(f) cannot be ignored in algebraic attacks. In the second part, we link boolean functions to hypergraphs so that we can apply known results in hypergraph theory to boolean functions. This not only allows us to find annihilators in a fast and simple way but also provides a good estimation of the upper bound on AI *(f).

On cheating immune secret sharing

The paper addresses the cheating prevention in secret sharing. We consider secret sharing with binary shares. The secret also is binary. This model allows us to use results and constructions from the well developed theory of cryptographically strong boolean functions. In particular, we prove that for given secret sharing, the average cheating probability over all cheating vectors and all original vectors, i.e., 1/n 2n ∑c=1...n ∑α∈V n ρc,α , denoted by ρ, satisfies ρ ≥ ½, and the equality holds if and only if ρc,α satisfies ρc,α= ½ for every cheating vector δc and every original vector α. In this case the secret sharing is said to be cheating immune. We further establish a relationship between cheating-immune secret sharing and cryptographic criteria of boolean functions.This enables us to construct cheating-immune secret sharing.