1 resultado para research methods - non-active role-playing method
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (14)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (14)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (19)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (107)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (263)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (2)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (11)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (17)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (14)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (5)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (55)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (21)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (3)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (8)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (3)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (19)
- Repositorio Institucional UNISALLE - Colombia (1)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (13)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (11)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (13)
- Universidade do Minho (12)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (51)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (13)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Innsbruck Digital Library - Austria (1)
- University of Michigan (6)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (77)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (32)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
Measuring and fulfilling user requirements during medical device development will result in successful products that improve patient safety, improve device effectiveness and reduce product recalls and modifications. Medical device users are an extremely heterogeneous group and for any one device the users may include patients, their carers as well as various healthcare professionals. There are a number of factors that make capturing user requirements for medical device development challenging including the ethical and research governance involved with studying users as well as the inevitable time and financial constraints. Most ergonomics research methods have been developed in response to such practical constraints and a number of these have potential for medical device development. Some are suitable for specific points in the device cycle such as contextual inquiry and ethnography, others, such as usability tests and focus groups may be used throughout development. When designing user research there are a number of factors that may affect the quality of data collected including the sample of users studied, the use of proxies instead of real end-users and the context in which the research is performed. As different methods are effective in identifying different types of data, ideally more than one method should be used at each point in development, however financial and time factors may often constrain this.