1 resultado para negotiation of difference
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (21)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (21)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (23)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (22)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (15)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (8)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (29)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (62)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (7)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (120)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (5)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (5)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (13)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (24)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (89)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (142)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (58)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (7)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (11)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (24)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (6)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (13)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (3)
Resumo:
Public participation in health-service management is an increasingly prominent policy internationally. Frequently, though, academic studies have found it marginalized by health professionals who, keen to retain control over decision-making, undermine the legitimacy of involved members of the public, in particular by questioning their representativeness. This paper examines this negotiation of representative legitimacy between staff and involved users by drawing on a qualitative study of service-user involvement in pilot cancer-genetics services recently introduced in England, using interviews, participant observation and documentary analysis. In contrast to the findings of much of the literature, health professionals identified some degree of representative legitimacy in the contributions made by users. However, the ways in which staff and users constructed representativeness diverged significantly. Where staff valued the identities of users as biomedical and lay subjects, users themselves described the legitimacy of their contribution in more expansive terms of knowledge and citizenship. My analysis seeks to show how disputes over representativeness relate not just to a struggle for power according to contrasting group interests, but also to a substantive divergence in understanding of the nature of representativeness in the context of state-orchestrated efforts to increase public participation. This divergence might suggest problems with the enactment of such aspirations in practice; alternatively, however, contestation of representative legitimacy might be understood as reflecting ambiguities in policy-level objectives for participation, which secure implementation by accommodating the divergent constructions of those charged with putting initiatives into practice.