1 resultado para bioethics committees
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (235)
- Archive of European Integration (55)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (24)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (25)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (5)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (12)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (13)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (5)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (8)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (67)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (46)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (156)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (5)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Scielo España (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (18)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (6)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (88)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (119)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (5)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Should data monitoring committees assess efficacy when considering safety in trails in acute stroke?
Relevância:
Resumo:
The primary role of a trials Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) is to ensure the safety of enrolled patients. In stroke trials, safety is monitored typically by comparing death and stroke specific events between treatment groups. DMCs may also have the remit for monitoring efficacy depending on the aims of the trial. We hypothesised that functional outcome at end of follow-up, a measure of efficacy, is also a powerful measure of safety and tested this in a systematic review