1 resultado para basic health services
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (20)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (7)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (12)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (14)
- Brock University, Canada (7)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (8)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (5)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (10)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (10)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (174)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Howard @ Howard University | Howard University Research (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (20)
- Duke University (8)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (10)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (67)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (320)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (40)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (5)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (24)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (8)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (14)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (7)
- University of Michigan (65)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (24)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The referral letter is a key instrument in moving patients from primary to secondary care services. Consequently, the circumstances in which a referral should be made and its contents have been the subject of clinical guidelines. This article is based on a project that demonstrated that physicians do not adhere to clinical guidelines when referring patients to secondary mental health services. This research supports earlier findings into noncompliance with guidelines by general practitioners (GPs). The authors briefly note possible reasons, which have been the subject of some debate. They also present a content analysis of referral letters to demonstrate the important ways in which they differ from guideline criteria. However, their central argument is that the role of the referral letter in relation to the GP’s repertoire of treatments has not been understood fully. Such understanding implies the need for a reexamination of the support available for GPs.