1 resultado para Units of analysis
em Nottingham eTheses
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (22)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (4)
- Archive of European Integration (24)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (17)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (9)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (41)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (13)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (6)
- CaltechTHESIS (8)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (8)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (24)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (45)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (11)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (35)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (6)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (19)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (50)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia - Portugal (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (14)
- Memorial University Research Repository (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (7)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (9)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (166)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (16)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (147)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (6)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (43)
- RU-FFYL. Repositorio de la Facultad de Filosofiía y Letras. UNAM. - Mexico (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (14)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (8)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Michigan (24)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (9)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Assessing the fit of a model is an important final step in any statistical analysis, but this is not straightforward when complex discrete response models are used. Cross validation and posterior predictions have been suggested as methods to aid model criticism. In this paper a comparison is made between four methods of model predictive assessment in the context of a three level logistic regression model for clinical mastitis in dairy cattle; cross validation, a prediction using the full posterior predictive distribution and two “mixed” predictive methods that incorporate higher level random effects simulated from the underlying model distribution. Cross validation is considered a gold standard method but is computationally intensive and thus a comparison is made between posterior predictive assessments and cross validation. The analyses revealed that mixed prediction methods produced results close to cross validation whilst the full posterior predictive assessment gave predictions that were over-optimistic (closer to the observed disease rates) compared with cross validation. A mixed prediction method that simulated random effects from both higher levels was best at identifying the outlying level two (farm-year) units of interest. It is concluded that this mixed prediction method, simulating random effects from both higher levels, is straightforward and may be of value in model criticism of multilevel logistic regression, a technique commonly used for animal health data with a hierarchical structure.